[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230726121435.stqwc3jzjll222ck@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:14:35 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Cc: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Atin Bainada <hi@...nb.me>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] net: dsa: qca8k: make learning configurable
and keep off if standalone
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:19:34AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > +int qca8k_port_pre_bridge_flags(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> > + struct switchdev_brport_flags flags,
> > + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > +{
> > + if (flags.mask & ~BR_LEARNING)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> If I am reading things right then some implementation of this callback
> return -EINVAL when they see unexpected flags. And some seem not to
> - possibly because all flags are expected.
>
> So I'm slightly unsure if this is correct or not.
Which ones don't? All handlers of SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS
should return -EINVAL for changes made to bridge port flags that aren't
supported.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists