lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fce08e76da7e3882319ae935c38e9e2eccf2dcae.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:44:29 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>, 
 "'willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com'" <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
 "'davem@...emloft.net'" <davem@...emloft.net>,  "'dsahern@...nel.org'"
 <dsahern@...nel.org>, 'Eric Dumazet' <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 "'kuba@...nel.org'" <kuba@...nel.org>, "'netdev@...r.kernel.org'"
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Move hash calculation inside udp4_lib_lookup2()

On Wed, 2023-07-26 at 12:05 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> Pass the udptable address into udp4_lib_lookup2() instead of the hash slot.
> 
> While ipv4_portaddr_hash(net, IP_ADDR_ANY, 0) is constant for each net
> (the port is an xor) the value isn't saved.
> Since the hash function doesn't get simplified when passed zero the hash

Are you sure? could you please objdump and compare the binary code
generated before and after the patch? In theory all the callers up to
__jhash_final() included should be inlined, and the compiler should be
able to optimze at least rol32(0, <n>).

Cheers,

Paolo


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ