[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM0EoM=LiL-exVpP-sTT8rh=odFhu_eYY=ob6yMxQP5MGTU00w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:59:02 -0400
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: valis <sec@...is.email>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, pctammela@...atatu.com, victor@...atatu.com,
ramdhan@...rlabs.sg, billy@...rlabs.sg,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] net/sched Bind logic fixes for cls_fw, cls_u32
and cls_route
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 6:03 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 23:36:14 +0200 valis wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:09 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > We don't know who you are. To my understanding the adjustment means
> > > that you are not obligated to use the name on your birth certificate
> > > but we need to know who you are.
> >
> > I could start a discussion about what makes a name valid, but I'm
> > pretty sure netdev is not the right place for it.
>
> Agreed, I CCed Greg KH to keep me honest, in case I'm outright
> incorrect. If it's a gray zone kinda answer I'm guessing that
> nobody here really wants to spend time discussing it.
>
> > > Why is it always "security" people who try act like this is some make
> > > believe metaverse. We're working on a real project with real licenses
> > > and real legal implications.
> > >
> > > Your S-o-b is pretty much meaningless. If a "real" person can vouch for
> > > who you are or put their own S-o-b on your code that's fine.
> >
> > I posted my patches to this mailing list per maintainer's request and
> > according to the published rules of the patch submission process as I
> > understood them.
> > Sorry if I misinterpreted something and wasted anybody's time.
> >
> > I'm not going to resubmit the patches under a different name.
> >
> > Please feel free to use them if someone is willing to sign off on them.
>
> If Jamal or anyone else feels like they can vouch for the provenance
> of the code, I think that may be the best compromise.
I am more than happy to add my SoB - these are real issues being fixed
and this is not the first time that Valis identified and helped
resolve legit issues in tc.
cheers,
jamal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists