netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] net: introduce __sk_rmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANn89i+DuhGRXj9U-iXcEA__j6jvV5FC+tLNkGBCSqMCPpuFaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 16:25:34 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	john.fastabend@...il.com, jakub@...udflare.com, dsahern@...nel.org, 
	ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] net: introduce __sk_rmem_schedule() helper

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 4:15 PM Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Compared with sk_wmem_schedule(), sk_rmem_schedule() not only performs
> rmem accounting, but also checks skb_pfmemalloc. The __sk_rmem_schedule()
> helper function is introduced here to perform only rmem accounting related
> activities.
>

Why not care about pfmemalloc ? Why is it safe ?

You need to give more details, or simply reuse the existing helper.

> Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@...wei.com>
> ---
>  include/net/sock.h | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index 2eb916d1ff64..58bf26c5c041 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -1617,16 +1617,20 @@ static inline bool sk_wmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, int size)
>         return delta <= 0 || __sk_mem_schedule(sk, delta, SK_MEM_SEND);
>  }
>
> -static inline bool
> -sk_rmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int size)
> +static inline bool __sk_rmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, int size)
>  {
>         int delta;
>
>         if (!sk_has_account(sk))
>                 return true;
>         delta = size - sk->sk_forward_alloc;
> -       return delta <= 0 || __sk_mem_schedule(sk, delta, SK_MEM_RECV) ||
> -               skb_pfmemalloc(skb);
> +       return delta <= 0 || __sk_mem_schedule(sk, delta, SK_MEM_RECV);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool
> +sk_rmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int size)
> +{
> +       return __sk_rmem_schedule(sk, size) || skb_pfmemalloc(skb);
>  }
>
>  static inline int sk_unused_reserved_mem(const struct sock *sk)
> --
> 2.34.1
>