[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c69866c3-aa90-45bc-8dd6-556f474bb693@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 17:56:04 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Hawkins, Nick" <nick.hawkins@....com>
Cc: "Verdun, Jean-Marie" <verdun@....com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] dt-bindings: net: Add HPE GXP UMAC
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:35:48PM +0000, Hawkins, Nick wrote:
> > > > Do both ports get the sane MAC address?
> > >
> > > No they do not. The first one will get the MAC address, the second
> > > will be an external phy we are managing via the MDIO path.
>
> > Then please put the mac-address property in the correct place, inside
> port@0.
>
> Greetings Andrew,
>
> I was mistaken, the Mac address belongs with UMAC,
> not the phys. The reason ports are listed here is
> because having two separate phy-handles
> in one node is not allowed. The layout of the
> hardware inside the GXP is unconventional.
It is not that unconventional. See
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/marvell-orion-net.txt
This is an Ethernet block, with two MACs inside it. Each MAC gets its
own subblock containing MAC specific properties like the MAC address,
phy-handle, etc.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists