| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 17:58:12 +0000
From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <oxffffaa@...il.com>
Cc: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>, Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>,
VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v5 13/14] virtio/vsock: implement datagram
support
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 11:45:29AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>
>
> On 19.07.2023 03:50, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > This commit implements datagram support for virtio/vsock by teaching
> > virtio to use the general virtio transport ->dgram_addr_init() function
> > and implementation a new version of ->dgram_allow().
> >
> > Additionally, it drops virtio_transport_dgram_allow() as an exported
> > symbol because it is no longer used in other transports.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 -
> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 6 ------
> > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > index b3856b8a42b3..d0a4f08b12c1 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > @@ -211,7 +211,6 @@ void virtio_transport_notify_buffer_size(struct vsock_sock *vsk, u64 *val);
> > u64 virtio_transport_stream_rcvhiwat(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> > bool virtio_transport_stream_is_active(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> > bool virtio_transport_stream_allow(u32 cid, u32 port);
> > -bool virtio_transport_dgram_allow(u32 cid, u32 port);
> > void virtio_transport_dgram_addr_init(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > struct sockaddr_vm *addr);
> >
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> > index ac2126c7dac5..713718861bd4 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ struct virtio_vsock {
> >
> > u32 guest_cid;
> > bool seqpacket_allow;
> > + bool dgram_allow;
> > };
> >
> > static u32 virtio_transport_get_local_cid(void)
> > @@ -413,6 +414,7 @@ static void virtio_vsock_rx_done(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work);
> > }
> >
> > +static bool virtio_transport_dgram_allow(u32 cid, u32 port);
>
> May be add body here? Without prototyping? Same for loopback and vhost.
>
Sounds okay with me, but this seems to go against the pattern
established by seqpacket. Any reason why?
> > static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(u32 remote_cid);
> >
> > static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> > @@ -430,6 +432,7 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> >
> > .dgram_enqueue = virtio_transport_dgram_enqueue,
> > .dgram_allow = virtio_transport_dgram_allow,
> > + .dgram_addr_init = virtio_transport_dgram_addr_init,
> >
> > .stream_dequeue = virtio_transport_stream_dequeue,
> > .stream_enqueue = virtio_transport_stream_enqueue,
> > @@ -462,6 +465,21 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> > .send_pkt = virtio_transport_send_pkt,
> > };
> >
> > +static bool virtio_transport_dgram_allow(u32 cid, u32 port)
> > +{
> > + struct virtio_vsock *vsock;
> > + bool dgram_allow;
> > +
> > + dgram_allow = false;
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + vsock = rcu_dereference(the_virtio_vsock);
> > + if (vsock)
> > + dgram_allow = vsock->dgram_allow;
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > + return dgram_allow;
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(u32 remote_cid)
> > {
> > struct virtio_vsock *vsock;
> > @@ -655,6 +673,9 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET))
> > vsock->seqpacket_allow = true;
> >
> > + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM))
> > + vsock->dgram_allow = true;
> > +
> > vdev->priv = vsock;
> >
> > ret = virtio_vsock_vqs_init(vsock);
> > @@ -747,7 +768,8 @@ static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> > };
> >
> > static unsigned int features[] = {
> > - VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET
> > + VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET,
> > + VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_DGRAM
> > };
> >
> > static struct virtio_driver virtio_vsock_driver = {
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > index 96118e258097..77898f5325cd 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > @@ -783,12 +783,6 @@ bool virtio_transport_stream_allow(u32 cid, u32 port)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_stream_allow);
> >
> > -bool virtio_transport_dgram_allow(u32 cid, u32 port)
> > -{
> > - return false;
> > -}
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_dgram_allow);
> > -
> > int virtio_transport_connect(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> > {
> > struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info info = {
> >
>
> Thanks, Arseniy
Thanks,
Bobby
Powered by blists - more mailing lists