[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZMFkFE0AqaOUfric@bullseye>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 18:21:08 +0000
From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <oxffffaa@...il.com>
Cc: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Bryan Tan <bryantan@...are.com>, Vishnu Dasa <vdasa@...are.com>,
VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v5 01/14] af_vsock: generalize
vsock_dgram_recvmsg() to all transports
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 09:11:44PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>
>
> On 19.07.2023 03:50, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > This commit drops the transport->dgram_dequeue callback and makes
> > vsock_dgram_recvmsg() generic to all transports.
> >
> > To make this possible, two transport-level changes are introduced:
> > - implementation of the ->dgram_addr_init() callback to initialize
> > the sockaddr_vm structure with data from incoming socket buffers.
> > - transport implementations set the skb->data pointer to the beginning
> > of the payload prior to adding the skb to the socket's receive queue.
> > That is, they must use skb_pull() before enqueuing. This is an
> > agreement between the transport and the socket layer that skb->data
> > always points to the beginning of the payload (and not, for example,
> > the packet header).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 1 -
> > include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 5 ---
> > include/net/af_vsock.h | 3 +-
> > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c | 7 ----
> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 1 -
> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 9 -----
> > net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 58 ++++++---------------------------
> > net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c | 1 -
> > 9 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> > index 6578db78f0ae..ae8891598a48 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> > @@ -410,7 +410,6 @@ static struct virtio_transport vhost_transport = {
> > .cancel_pkt = vhost_transport_cancel_pkt,
> >
> > .dgram_enqueue = virtio_transport_dgram_enqueue,
> > - .dgram_dequeue = virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue,
> > .dgram_bind = virtio_transport_dgram_bind,
> > .dgram_allow = virtio_transport_dgram_allow,
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > index c58453699ee9..18cbe8d37fca 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > @@ -167,11 +167,6 @@ virtio_transport_stream_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > size_t len,
> > int type);
> > int
> > -virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > - struct msghdr *msg,
> > - size_t len, int flags);
> > -
> > -int
> > virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > struct msghdr *msg,
> > size_t len);
> > diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> > index 0e7504a42925..305d57502e89 100644
> > --- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
> > @@ -120,11 +120,10 @@ struct vsock_transport {
> >
> > /* DGRAM. */
> > int (*dgram_bind)(struct vsock_sock *, struct sockaddr_vm *);
> > - int (*dgram_dequeue)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct msghdr *msg,
> > - size_t len, int flags);
> > int (*dgram_enqueue)(struct vsock_sock *, struct sockaddr_vm *,
> > struct msghdr *, size_t len);
> > bool (*dgram_allow)(u32 cid, u32 port);
> > + void (*dgram_addr_init)(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sockaddr_vm *addr);
> >
> > /* STREAM. */
> > /* TODO: stream_bind() */
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > index deb72a8c44a7..ad71e084bf2f 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > @@ -1272,11 +1272,15 @@ static int vsock_dgram_connect(struct socket *sock,
> > int vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> > size_t len, int flags)
> > {
> > + const struct vsock_transport *transport;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> > const struct proto *prot;
> > #endif
> > struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > + size_t payload_len;
> > struct sock *sk;
> > + int err;
> >
> > sk = sock->sk;
> > vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> > @@ -1287,7 +1291,41 @@ int vsock_dgram_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> > return prot->recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags, NULL);
> > #endif
> >
> > - return vsk->transport->dgram_dequeue(vsk, msg, len, flags);
> > + if (flags & MSG_OOB || flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE)
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + transport = vsk->transport;
> > +
> > + /* Retrieve the head sk_buff from the socket's receive queue. */
> > + err = 0;
> > + skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk_vsock(vsk), flags, &err);
> > + if (!skb)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + payload_len = skb->len;
> > +
> > + if (payload_len > len) {
> > + payload_len = len;
> > + msg->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Place the datagram payload in the user's iovec. */
> > + err = skb_copy_datagram_msg(skb, 0, msg, payload_len);
> > + if (err)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + if (msg->msg_name) {
> > + /* Provide the address of the sender. */
> > + DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_vm *, vm_addr, msg->msg_name);
> > +
> > + transport->dgram_addr_init(skb, vm_addr);
>
> Do we need check that dgram_addr_init != NULL? because I see that not all transports have this
> callback set in this patch
>
How about adding the check somewhere outside of the hotpath, such as
when the transport is assigned?
> > + msg->msg_namelen = sizeof(*vm_addr);
> > + }
> > + err = payload_len;
> > +
> > +out:
> > + skb_free_datagram(&vsk->sk, skb);
> > + return err;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_dgram_recvmsg);
> >
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
> > index 7cb1a9d2cdb4..7f1ea434656d 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
> > @@ -556,12 +556,6 @@ static int hvs_dgram_bind(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > }
> >
> > -static int hvs_dgram_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct msghdr *msg,
> > - size_t len, int flags)
> > -{
> > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int hvs_dgram_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > struct sockaddr_vm *remote, struct msghdr *msg,
> > size_t dgram_len)
> > @@ -833,7 +827,6 @@ static struct vsock_transport hvs_transport = {
> > .shutdown = hvs_shutdown,
> >
> > .dgram_bind = hvs_dgram_bind,
> > - .dgram_dequeue = hvs_dgram_dequeue,
> > .dgram_enqueue = hvs_dgram_enqueue,
> > .dgram_allow = hvs_dgram_allow,
> >
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> > index e95df847176b..66edffdbf303 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> > @@ -429,7 +429,6 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> > .cancel_pkt = virtio_transport_cancel_pkt,
> >
> > .dgram_bind = virtio_transport_dgram_bind,
> > - .dgram_dequeue = virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue,
> > .dgram_enqueue = virtio_transport_dgram_enqueue,
> > .dgram_allow = virtio_transport_dgram_allow,
> >
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > index b769fc258931..01ea1402ad40 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > @@ -583,15 +583,6 @@ virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue);
> >
> > -int
> > -virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > - struct msghdr *msg,
> > - size_t len, int flags)
> > -{
> > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > -}
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue);
> > -
> > s64 virtio_transport_stream_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> > {
> > struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs = vsk->trans;
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> > index b370070194fa..0bbbdb222245 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> > @@ -641,6 +641,7 @@ static int vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb(void *data, struct vmci_datagram *dg)
> > sock_hold(sk);
> > skb_put(skb, size);
> > memcpy(skb->data, dg, size);
> > + skb_pull(skb, VMCI_DG_HEADERSIZE);
> > sk_receive_skb(sk, skb, 0);
> >
> > return VMCI_SUCCESS;
> > @@ -1731,57 +1732,18 @@ static int vmci_transport_dgram_enqueue(
> > return err - sizeof(*dg);
> > }
> >
> > -static int vmci_transport_dgram_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > - struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> > - int flags)
> > +static void vmci_transport_dgram_addr_init(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > + struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
> > {
> > - int err;
> > struct vmci_datagram *dg;
> > - size_t payload_len;
> > - struct sk_buff *skb;
> > -
> > - if (flags & MSG_OOB || flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE)
> > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > -
> > - /* Retrieve the head sk_buff from the socket's receive queue. */
> > - err = 0;
> > - skb = skb_recv_datagram(&vsk->sk, flags, &err);
> > - if (!skb)
> > - return err;
> > -
> > - dg = (struct vmci_datagram *)skb->data;
> > - if (!dg)
> > - /* err is 0, meaning we read zero bytes. */
> > - goto out;
> > -
> > - payload_len = dg->payload_size;
> > - /* Ensure the sk_buff matches the payload size claimed in the packet. */
> > - if (payload_len != skb->len - sizeof(*dg)) {
> > - err = -EINVAL;
> > - goto out;
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (payload_len > len) {
> > - payload_len = len;
> > - msg->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
> > - }
> > + unsigned int cid, port;
> >
> > - /* Place the datagram payload in the user's iovec. */
> > - err = skb_copy_datagram_msg(skb, sizeof(*dg), msg, payload_len);
> > - if (err)
> > - goto out;
> > -
> > - if (msg->msg_name) {
> > - /* Provide the address of the sender. */
> > - DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_vm *, vm_addr, msg->msg_name);
> > - vsock_addr_init(vm_addr, dg->src.context, dg->src.resource);
> > - msg->msg_namelen = sizeof(*vm_addr);
> > - }
> > - err = payload_len;
> > + WARN_ONCE(skb->head == skb->data, "vmci vsock bug: bad dgram skb");
> >
> > -out:
> > - skb_free_datagram(&vsk->sk, skb);
> > - return err;
> > + dg = (struct vmci_datagram *)skb->head;
> > + cid = dg->src.context;
> > + port = dg->src.resource;
> > + vsock_addr_init(addr, cid, port);
>
> I think we
>
> 1) can short this to:
>
> vsock_addr_init(addr, dg->src.context, dg->src.resource);
>
> 2) w/o previous point, cid and port better be u32, as VMCI structure has u32 fields 'context' and
> 'resource' and 'vsock_addr_init()' also has u32 type for both arguments.
>
> Thanks, Arseniy
Sounds good, thanks.
>
> > }
> >
> > static bool vmci_transport_dgram_allow(u32 cid, u32 port)
> > @@ -2040,9 +2002,9 @@ static struct vsock_transport vmci_transport = {
> > .release = vmci_transport_release,
> > .connect = vmci_transport_connect,
> > .dgram_bind = vmci_transport_dgram_bind,
> > - .dgram_dequeue = vmci_transport_dgram_dequeue,
> > .dgram_enqueue = vmci_transport_dgram_enqueue,
> > .dgram_allow = vmci_transport_dgram_allow,
> > + .dgram_addr_init = vmci_transport_dgram_addr_init,
> > .stream_dequeue = vmci_transport_stream_dequeue,
> > .stream_enqueue = vmci_transport_stream_enqueue,
> > .stream_has_data = vmci_transport_stream_has_data,
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
> > index 5c6360df1f31..2a59dd177c74 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
> > @@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ static struct virtio_transport loopback_transport = {
> > .cancel_pkt = vsock_loopback_cancel_pkt,
> >
> > .dgram_bind = virtio_transport_dgram_bind,
> > - .dgram_dequeue = virtio_transport_dgram_dequeue,
> > .dgram_enqueue = virtio_transport_dgram_enqueue,
> > .dgram_allow = virtio_transport_dgram_allow,
> >
> >
Thanks,
Bobby
Powered by blists - more mailing lists