netdev - RE: [PATCH 09/11] ice: implement dpll interface to control cgu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB46576C213362F2A76466A0FA9B00A@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 21:10:04 +0000
From: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "Jiri
 Pirko" <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>, Jonathan Lemon
	<jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, "Olech, Milena" <milena.olech@...el.com>,
	"Michalik, Michal" <michal.michalik@...el.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, poros <poros@...hat.com>, mschmidt
	<mschmidt@...hat.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, Bart Van Assche
	<bvanassche@....org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 09/11] ice: implement dpll interface to control cgu


>From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 5:20 PM
>
>On Tue, 2023-07-25 at 15:49 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 14:02:08 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > So it is not a mode! Mode is either "automatic" or "manual". Then we
>> > have a state to indicate the state of the state machine (unlocked,
>> > locked,
>> > holdover, holdover-acq). So what you seek is a way for the user to
>> > expliticly set the state to "unlocked" and reset of the state machine.
>>
>> +1 for mixing the state machine and config.
>> Maybe a compromise would be to rename the config mode?
>> Detached? Standalone?
>
>For the records, I don't know the H/W details to any extents, but
>generally speaking it sounds reasonable to me that a mode change could
>cause a state change.
>
>e.g. switching an ethernet device autoneg mode could cause the link
>state to flip.
>
>So I'm ok with the existence of the freerun mode.
>
>I think it should be clarified what happens if pins are manually
>enabled in such mode. I expect ~nothing will change, but stating it
>clearly would help.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Paolo
>

Thank you for the insights!
Arkadiusz