[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <E459C68E-59C1-422C-A0A4-49CA1E656802@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 13:05:50 +0000
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Chuck Lever <cel@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-tls-handshake@...ts.linux.dev" <kernel-tls-handshake@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] net/tls: Move TLS protocol elements to a
separate header
> On Jul 27, 2023, at 12:36 AM, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:35:51 -0400 Chuck Lever wrote:
>> --- a/include/net/tls.h
>> +++ b/include/net/tls.h
>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
>>
>> #include <net/net_namespace.h>
>> #include <net/tcp.h>
>> +#include <net/tls_prot.h>
>
> I'd be tempted to push this only to places that need it:
>
> net/tls/tls.h
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/chtls/chtls_io.c
>
> to make rebuilds smaller. Bunch of ethernet drivers will get rebuilt
> every time we touch this header, and they don't care about the proto
> details.
That's sensible -- actually that's the whole point of this patch.
I will respin.
> But I'm probably overly sensitive to build times so up to you.
--
Chuck Lever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists