[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZMJy6yt4CL250x6Q@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 06:36:43 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Johannes Zink <j.zink@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, patchwork-jzi@...gutronix.de,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: stmmac: correct MAC propagation delay
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 09:20:10AM +0200, Johannes Zink wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 7/26/23 22:57, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:01:31PM +0200, Johannes Zink wrote:
> >
> > Earlier versions of the IP core return zero from these...
> >
> > > +#define PTP_TS_INGR_LAT 0x68 /* MAC internal Ingress Latency */
> > > +#define PTP_TS_EGR_LAT 0x6c /* MAC internal Egress Latency */
> >
>
> good catch. Gonna send a v3 with a check to and set the values for dwmac v5 only.
AFAICT there is no feature bit that indicates the presence or absence
of these two registers.
Are you sure that *all* v5 IP cores have these?
I am not sure.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists