lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 10:43:12 +0530
From: Souradeep Chakrabarti <souradch.linux@...il.com>
To: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>
Cc: Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@...ux.microsoft.com>, kys@...rosoft.com, 
	haiyangz@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org, decui@...rosoft.com, 
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	longli@...rosoft.com, sharmaajay@...rosoft.com, leon@...nel.org, 
	cai.huoqing@...ux.dev, ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, 
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, 
	schakrabarti@...rosoft.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 net] net: mana: Fix MANA VF unload when hardware is

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 9:07 AM Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> 在 2023/7/26 21:15, Souradeep Chakrabarti 写道:
> > When unloading the MANA driver, mana_dealloc_queues() waits for the MANA
> > hardware to complete any inflight packets and set the pending send count
> > to zero. But if the hardware has failed, mana_dealloc_queues()
> > could wait forever.
> >
> > Fix this by adding a timeout to the wait. Set the timeout to 120 seconds,
> > which is a somewhat arbitrary value that is more than long enough for
> > functional hardware to complete any sends.
> >
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Fixes: ca9c54d2d6a5 ("net: mana: Add a driver for Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA)")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Souradeep Chakrabarti <schakrabarti@...ux.microsoft.com>
> > ---
> > V5 -> V6:
> > * Added pcie_flr to reset the pci after timeout.
> > * Fixed the position of changelog.
> > * Removed unused variable like cq.
> >
> > V4 -> V5:
> > * Added fixes tag
> > * Changed the usleep_range from static to incremental value.
> > * Initialized timeout in the begining.
> >
> > V3 -> V4:
> > * Removed the unnecessary braces from mana_dealloc_queues().
> >
> > V2 -> V3:
> > * Removed the unnecessary braces from mana_dealloc_queues().
> >
> > V1 -> V2:
> > * Added net branch
> > * Removed the typecasting to (struct mana_context*) of void pointer
> > * Repositioned timeout variable in mana_dealloc_queues()
> > * Repositioned vf_unload_timeout in mana_context struct, to utilise the
> >   6 bytes hole
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++--
> >   1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> > index a499e460594b..ea039e2d4c4b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/ethtool.h>
> >   #include <linux/filter.h>
> >   #include <linux/mm.h>
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> >
> >   #include <net/checksum.h>
> >   #include <net/ip6_checksum.h>
> > @@ -2345,9 +2346,12 @@ int mana_attach(struct net_device *ndev)
> >   static int mana_dealloc_queues(struct net_device *ndev)
> >   {
> >       struct mana_port_context *apc = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > +     unsigned long timeout = jiffies + 120 * HZ;
> >       struct gdma_dev *gd = apc->ac->gdma_dev;
> >       struct mana_txq *txq;
> > +     struct sk_buff *skb;
> >       int i, err;
> > +     u32 tsleep;
> >
> >       if (apc->port_is_up)
> >               return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -2363,15 +2367,41 @@ static int mana_dealloc_queues(struct net_device *ndev)
> >        * to false, but it doesn't matter since mana_start_xmit() drops any
> >        * new packets due to apc->port_is_up being false.
> >        *
> > -      * Drain all the in-flight TX packets
> > +      * Drain all the in-flight TX packets.
> > +      * A timeout of 120 seconds for all the queues is used.
> > +      * This will break the while loop when h/w is not responding.
> > +      * This value of 120 has been decided here considering max
> > +      * number of queues.
> >        */
> > +
> >       for (i = 0; i < apc->num_queues; i++) {
> >               txq = &apc->tx_qp[i].txq;
> > -
> > -             while (atomic_read(&txq->pending_sends) > 0)
> > -                     usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> > +             tsleep = 1000;
> > +             while (atomic_read(&txq->pending_sends) > 0 &&
> > +                    time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> > +                     usleep_range(tsleep, tsleep + 1000);
> > +                     tsleep <<= 1;
> > +             }
> > +             if (atomic_read(&txq->pending_sends)) {
> > +                     err  = pcie_flr(to_pci_dev(gd->gdma_context->dev));
> > +                     if (err) {
> > +                             netdev_err(ndev, "flr failed %d with %d pkts pending in txq %u\n",
> > +                                        err, atomic_read(&txq->pending_sends),
> > +                                        txq->gdma_txq_id);
> > +                     }
> > +                     break;
> > +             }
> >       }
> >
> > +     for (i = 0; i < apc->num_queues; i++) {
> > +             txq = &apc->tx_qp[i].txq;
> > +             while (atomic_read(&txq->pending_sends)) {
> > +                     skb = skb_dequeue(&txq->pending_skbs);
> > +                     mana_unmap_skb(skb, apc);
> > +                     dev_consume_skb_any(skb);
> > +                     atomic_sub(1, &txq->pending_sends);
> > +             }
> If I get this commit correctly, txq->pending_sends should be equal to
> the length of txq->pending_skbs?
>
> If yes, can we only handle the pending_skbs?
>
> the above snippet can be changed to as below? So the performance is better?
> "
>                 while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&txq->pending_skbs))) {
>                         mana_unmap_skb(skb, apc);
>                         dev_consume_skb_any(skb);
>                 }
>                 atomic_set(&txq->pending_sends, 0);
> "
>
> Zhu Yanjun
Yes, we can do that, thanks for pointing. Will take care of it in next version.
>
> > +     }
> >       /* We're 100% sure the queues can no longer be woken up, because
> >        * we're sure now mana_poll_tx_cq() can't be running.
> >        */
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ