[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06859eed-6f9b-5d66-3221-e55dcd83466c@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 08:42:52 +0200
From: Johannes Zink <j.zink@...gutronix.de>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Maxime Coquelin
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
patchwork-jzi@...gutronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: stmmac: correct MAC propagation delay
Hi Richard,
On 7/26/23 20:00, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:01:31PM +0200, Johannes Zink wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ptp.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ptp.h
>> index bf619295d079..d1fe4b46f162 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ptp.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ptp.h
>> @@ -26,6 +26,12 @@
>> #define PTP_ACR 0x40 /* Auxiliary Control Reg */
>> #define PTP_ATNR 0x48 /* Auxiliary Timestamp - Nanoseconds Reg */
>> #define PTP_ATSR 0x4c /* Auxiliary Timestamp - Seconds Reg */
>> +#define PTP_TS_INGR_CORR_NS 0x58 /* Ingress timestamp correction nanoseconds */
>> +#define PTP_TS_EGR_CORR_NS 0x5C /* Egress timestamp correction nanoseconds*/
>> +#define PTP_TS_INGR_CORR_SNS 0x60 /* Ingress timestamp correction subnanoseconds */
>> +#define PTP_TS_EGR_CORR_SNS 0x64 /* Egress timestamp correction subnanoseconds */
>
> These two...
>
>> +#define PTP_TS_INGR_LAT 0x68 /* MAC internal Ingress Latency */
>> +#define PTP_TS_EGR_LAT 0x6c /* MAC internal Egress Latency */
>
> do not exist on earlier versions of the IP core.
>
> I wonder what values are there?
>
good catch, I think adding the register definition won't hurt, but if you feel
more comfortable about it I can add them only for IP core version 5.
Johannes
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Johannes Zink |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686| Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists