[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<169050362043.24970.11385005356994975493.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:20:20 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Lin Ma <linma@....edu.cn>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, razor@...ckwall.org, idosch@...dia.com,
lucien.xin@...il.com, liuhangbin@...il.com, edwin.peer@...adcom.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, md.fahad.iqbal.polash@...el.com,
anirudh.venkataramanan@...el.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
neerav.parikh@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] rtnetlink: let rtnl_bridge_setlink checks
IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE length
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 15:53:14 +0800 you wrote:
> There are totally 9 ndo_bridge_setlink handlers in the current kernel,
> which are 1) bnxt_bridge_setlink, 2) be_ndo_bridge_setlink 3)
> i40e_ndo_bridge_setlink 4) ice_bridge_setlink 5)
> ixgbe_ndo_bridge_setlink 6) mlx5e_bridge_setlink 7)
> nfp_net_bridge_setlink 8) qeth_l2_bridge_setlink 9) br_setlink.
>
> By investigating the code, we find that 1-7 parse and use nlattr
> IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE but 3 and 4 forget to do the nla_len check. This can
> lead to an out-of-attribute read and allow a malformed nlattr (e.g.,
> length 0) to be viewed as a 2 byte integer.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v3] rtnetlink: let rtnl_bridge_setlink checks IFLA_BRIDGE_MODE length
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/d73ef2d69c0d
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists