[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db90161a-a6c0-2078-1a22-0f629d72c38a@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 15:55:49 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>, Alexander Duyck
<alexanderduyck@...com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, "Ilias
Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, Simon Horman
<simon.horman@...igine.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/9] page_pool: split types and declarations from
page_pool.h
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 19:58:01 +0800
> On 2023/7/27 22:43, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index d0553ad37865..30037d39b82d 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -16015,8 +16015,7 @@ M: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
>> L: netdev@...r.kernel.org
>> S: Supported
>> F: Documentation/networking/page_pool.rst
>> -F: include/net/page_pool.h
>> -F: include/trace/events/page_pool.h
>
> Is there any reason to remove the above?
Breh, that was accidental >_<
>
>> +F: include/net/page_pool/*.h
>
> It seems more common to use 'include/net/page_pool/' in
> MAINTAINERS.
I see now, looks like it. Will fix ._.
>
>> F: net/core/page_pool.c
>>
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists