netdev - Re: [PATCH 09/14] ax.25: Update to register_net_sysctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZMQF5mN7wWN2eax3@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 11:16:06 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>
Cc: Joerg Reuter <jreuter@...na.de>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	willy@...radead.org, keescook@...omium.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
	linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] ax.25: Update to register_net_sysctl_sz

On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 09:35:36AM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 08:44:24AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:31:12PM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> > > There are no deltas in this patch set. We start seeing the deltas when
> > > we start removing with the next 6 chunks. I'll try to make that more
> > > clear in the commit message.
> > 
> > Indeed, even if no deltas are created it is importan then to say that.
> > If there are no deltas the "why" becomes more important. If the why is
> > to make it easier to apply subsequent patches, that must be said. When
> yes. The why for this patch set in particular is to make it easier to
> apply the sentinel removal patches.
> 
> I think the difficulty for me comes from having two whys: 1. The one for
> this patch set which is to make it easier to apply sentinel removal patches. And 2.
> The one for the "big" patch (that actually removes the sentinels) which is to
> reduce build time size and run time memory bloat.

The 2) is part of the real why, 1) is more of how to do 2) cleanly. But
the real why is the savings in memory because we are moving arrays out
of kernel/sysctl.c so we don't want to incur a size penalty. The
collateral to avoid increasing size in the moves also proves to save us
more memory overall, on the ballpark of about 64 bytes per array in the
kernel both at runtime and build time. The build time gain is mostly
on the __init stuff and so gets freed right away, but since sysctl
code always kzallocs the arrays passed we also save 64 bytes per array
in the end at runtime.

  Luis