[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <266ab56e-ae83-7ddc-618e-3af228df81bd@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 15:02:19 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Yan Zhai <yan@...udflare.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...udflare.com, Jordan Griege <jgriege@...udflare.com>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf 1/2] bpf: fix skb_do_redirect return values
On 7/25/23 6:08 PM, Yan Zhai wrote:
> skb_do_redirect returns various of values: error code (negative),
> 0 (success), and some positive status code, e.g. NET_XMIT_CN,
> NET_RX_DROP. Commit 3a0af8fd61f9 ("bpf: BPF for lightweight tunnel
> infrastructure") didn't check the return code correctly, so positive
> values are propagated back along call chain:
>
> ip_finish_output2
> -> bpf_xmit
> -> run_lwt_bpf
> -> skb_do_redirect
From looking at skb_do_redirect, the skb_do_redirect should have consumed the
skb except for the -EAGAIN return value. afaik, -EAGAIN could only happen by
using the bpf_redirect_peer helper. lwt does not have the bpf_redirect_peer
helper available, so there is no -EAGAIN case in lwt. iow, skb_do_redirect
should have always consumed the skb in lwt. or did I miss something?
If that is the case, it feels like the fix should be in run_lwt_bpf() and the
"if (ret == 0)" test in run_lwt_bpf() is unnecessary?
ret = skb_do_redirect(skb);
if (ret == 0)
ret = BPF_REDIRECT;
>
> Inside ip_finish_output2, redirected skb will continue to neighbor
> subsystem as if LWTUNNEL_XMIT_CONTINUE is returned, despite that this
> skb could have been freed. The bug can trigger use-after-free warning
> and crashes kernel afterwards:
>
> https://gist.github.com/zhaiyan920/8fbac245b261fe316a7ef04c9b1eba48
Powered by blists - more mailing lists