[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fbda76a9-e1f3-d483-ab3d-3c904c54a5db@web.de>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 15:39:07 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Lin Ma <linma@....edu.cn>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jeff Kirsher
<jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dcb: choose correct policy to parse DCB_ATTR_BCN
…
> This patch use correct dcbnl_bcn_nest policy to parse the
> tb[DCB_ATTR_BCN] nested TLV.
Are imperative change descriptions still preferred?
See also:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.5-rc3#n94
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists