netdev - Re: [patch net-next v2 08/11] devlink: introduce set of macros and use it for split ops definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230731095745.60a965b8@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 09:57:45 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, moshe@...dia.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
 idosch@...dia.com, petrm@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 08/11] devlink: introduce set of macros and
 use it for split ops definitions

On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 14:21:52 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >If you want to use split ops extensively please use the nlspec
> >and generate the table automatically. Integrating closer with
> >the spec will have many benefits.  
> 
> Yeah, I was thinging about it, it just didn't seem necessary. Okay, will
> check that out.
> 
> Btw, does that mean that any split-ops usage would require generated
> code? If yes, could you please document that somewhere, probably near
> the struct?

I wrote it somewhere, probably the commit messages for the split ops.
The tools are not 100% ready for partial generation I don't want to
force everyone to do code gen. But the homegrown macros in every family
are a no go.