netdev - Re: [patch net-next v2 11/11] devlink: extend health reporter dump selector by port index

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230731100632.02c02b76@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 10:06:32 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, moshe@...dia.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
 idosch@...dia.com, petrm@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 11/11] devlink: extend health reporter dump
 selector by port index

On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 14:52:44 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >This patch is not very clean. IMHO implementing the filters by skipping
> >is not going to scale to reasonably complex filters. Isn't it better to  
> 
> I'm not sure what do you mean by skipping? There is not skipping. In
> case PORT_INDEX is passed in the selector, only that specific port is
> processed. No scale issues I see. Am I missing something?
> 
> 
> >add a .filter callback which will look at the about-to-be-dumped object
> >and return true/false on whether it should be dumped?  
> 
> No, that would not scale. Passing the selector attrs to the dump
> callback it better, as the dump callback according to the attrs can
> reach only what is needed, knowing the internals. But perhaps I don't
> understand correctly your suggestion.

for_each_obj() {
	if (obj_dump_filtered(obj, dump_info))  // < run filter
		continue;                       // < skip object

	dump_one(obj)
}