lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 17:57:40 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
    syzbot+f527b971b4bdc8e79f9e@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
    bpf@...r.kernel.org, brauner@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
    dsahern@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
    pabeni@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
    linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] udp: Fix __ip_append_data()'s handling of MSG_SPLICE_PAGES

Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:

> copy -= -fraggap definitely seems off. You point out that it even can
> turn length negative?

Yes.  See the logging I posted:

	==>splice_to_socket() 6630
	udp_sendmsg(8,8)
	__ip_append_data(copy=-1,len=8, mtu=8192 skblen=8189 maxfl=8188)
	pagedlen 9 = 9 - 0
	copy -1 = 9 - 0 - 1 - 9
	length 8 -= -1 + 0

Since datalen and transhdrlen cancel, and fraggap is unsigned, if fraggap is
non-zero, copy will be negative.

> The WARN_ON_ONCE, if it can be reached, will be user triggerable.
> Usually for those cases and when there is a viable return with error
> path, that is preferable. But if you prefer to taunt syzbot, ok. We
> can always remove this later.

It shouldn't be possible for length to exceed msg->msg_iter.count (assuming
there is a msg) coming from userspace; further, userspace can't directly
specify MSG_SPLICE_PAGES.

> __ip6_append_data probably needs the same.

Good point.  The arrangement of the code is a bit different, but I think it's
substantially the same in this regard.

David


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ