[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30cb80f5-c771-f853-9d41-719fa378e4f5@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 11:20:22 -0700
From: Brett Creeley <bcreeley@....com>
To: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>,
sasha.neftin@...el.com, Naama Meir <naamax.meir@...ux.intel.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] igc: Expose tx-usecs coalesce setting to user
On 8/1/2023 10:27 AM, Tony Nguyen wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> From: Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>
>
> When users attempt to obtain the coalesce setting using the
> ethtool command, current code always returns 0 for tx-usecs.
> This is because I225/6 always uses a queue pair setting, hence
> tx_coalesce_usecs does not return a value during the
> igc_ethtool_get_coalesce() callback process. The pair queue
> condition checking in igc_ethtool_get_coalesce() is removed by
> this patch so that the user gets information of the value of tx-usecs.
>
> Even if i225/6 is using queue pair setting, there is no harm in
> notifying the user of the tx-usecs. The implementation of the current
> code may have previously been a copy of the legacy code i210.
>
> How to test:
> User can get the coalesce value using ethtool command.
>
> Example command:
> Get: ethtool -c <interface>
>
> Previous output:
>
> rx-usecs: 3
> rx-frames: n/a
> rx-usecs-irq: n/a
> rx-frames-irq: n/a
>
> tx-usecs: 0
> tx-frames: n/a
> tx-usecs-irq: n/a
> tx-frames-irq: n/a
>
> New output:
>
> rx-usecs: 3
> rx-frames: n/a
> rx-usecs-irq: n/a
> rx-frames-irq: n/a
>
> tx-usecs: 3
> tx-frames: n/a
> tx-usecs-irq: n/a
> tx-frames-irq: n/a
>
> Fixes: 8c5ad0dae93c ("igc: Add ethtool support")
> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Naama Meir <naamax.meir@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c | 13 ++++---------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c
> index 93bce729be76..62d925b26f2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c
> @@ -880,12 +880,10 @@ static int igc_ethtool_get_coalesce(struct net_device *netdev,
> else
> ec->rx_coalesce_usecs = adapter->rx_itr_setting >> 2;
>
> - if (!(adapter->flags & IGC_FLAG_QUEUE_PAIRS)) {
> - if (adapter->tx_itr_setting <= 3)
> - ec->tx_coalesce_usecs = adapter->tx_itr_setting;
> - else
> - ec->tx_coalesce_usecs = adapter->tx_itr_setting >> 2;
> - }
> + if (adapter->tx_itr_setting <= 3)
> + ec->tx_coalesce_usecs = adapter->tx_itr_setting;
> + else
> + ec->tx_coalesce_usecs = adapter->tx_itr_setting >> 2;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -910,9 +908,6 @@ static int igc_ethtool_set_coalesce(struct net_device *netdev,
> ec->tx_coalesce_usecs == 2)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if ((adapter->flags & IGC_FLAG_QUEUE_PAIRS) && ec->tx_coalesce_usecs)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
Should this be part of patch 2/2 or is it necessary to remove this for
the get flow?
> /* If ITR is disabled, disable DMAC */
> if (ec->rx_coalesce_usecs == 0) {
> if (adapter->flags & IGC_FLAG_DMAC)
> --
> 2.38.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists