netdev - [PATCH v2] drm/modes: Fix division by zero error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230801215538.105255-1-astrajoan@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue,  1 Aug 2023 14:55:38 -0700
From: Ziqi Zhao <astrajoan@...oo.com>
To: syzbot+622bba18029bcde672e1@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
	astrajoan@...oo.com,
	jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
	airlied@...il.com,
	daniel@...ll.ch,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	ivan.orlov0322@...il.com,
	maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com,
	mripard@...nel.org,
	skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
	tzimmermann@...e.de
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
	dsahern@...nel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
	jiri@...dia.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/modes: Fix division by zero error

In the bug reported by Syzbot, the variable `den == (1 << 22)` and
`mode->vscan == (1 << 10)`, causing the multiplication to overflow and
accidentally make `den == 0`. To prevent any chance of overflow, we
replace `num` and `den` with 64-bit unsigned integers, and explicitly
check if the divisor `den` will overflow. If so, we employ full 64-bit
division with rounding; otherwise we keep the 64-bit to 32-bit division
that could potentially be better optimized.

In order to minimize the performance overhead, the overflow check for
`den` is wrapped with an `unlikely` condition. Please let me know if
this usage is appropriate.

Reported-by: syzbot+622bba18029bcde672e1@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ziqi Zhao <astrajoan@...oo.com>
---
V1 -> V2: address style comments suggested by Jani Nikula
<jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
index ac9a406250c5..137101960690 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
@@ -1285,13 +1285,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_set_name);
  */
 int drm_mode_vrefresh(const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
 {
-	unsigned int num, den;
+	u64 num, den;
 
 	if (mode->htotal == 0 || mode->vtotal == 0)
 		return 0;
 
-	num = mode->clock;
-	den = mode->htotal * mode->vtotal;
+	num = mul_u32_u32(mode->clock, 1000);
+	den = mul_u32_u32(mode->htotal, mode->vtotal);
 
 	if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
 		num *= 2;
@@ -1300,7 +1300,10 @@ int drm_mode_vrefresh(const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
 	if (mode->vscan > 1)
 		den *= mode->vscan;
 
-	return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(mul_u32_u32(num, 1000), den);
+	if (unlikely(den > UINT_MAX))
+		return DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(num, den);
+
+	return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(num, (u32) den);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_vrefresh);
 
-- 
2.34.1