lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 18:43:44 +0000
From: Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
To: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	David Bauer <mail@...id-bauer.net>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@....com>, Wei Fang
	<wei.fang@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] net: phy: at803x: fix the wol setting functions



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2023 5:22 AM
> To: Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>; Heiner Kallweit
> <hkallweit1@...il.com>; David S . Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Jakub
> Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; David Bauer <mail@...id-bauer.net>;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Viorel Suman
> <viorel.suman@....com>; Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] net: phy: at803x: fix the wol setting functions
> 
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 04:53:19PM -0500, Li Yang wrote:
> > In commit 7beecaf7d507 ("net: phy: at803x: improve the WOL feature"),
> > it seems not correct to use a wol_en bit in a 1588 Control Register
> > which is only available on AR8031/AR8033(share the same phy_id) to
> > determine if WoL is enabled.  Change it back to use
> > AT803X_INTR_ENABLE_WOL for determining the WoL status which is
> > applicable on all chips supporting wol. Also update the
> > at803x_set_wol() function to only update the 1588 register on chips
> > having it.  After this change, disabling wol at probe from commit
> > d7cd5e06c9dd ("net: phy: at803x: disable WOL at probe") is no longer
> needed.  So that part is removed.
> 
> Okay, having been through the AR8031, AR8033, and AR8035 datasheets that
> I have, this is what I've gathered:
> 
> AR8031 and AR8033 are identical as far as WoL is concerned:
> 	In terms of hardware, these have a WOL_INT pin that is separate
> 	from the normal interrupt.
> 
> 	MMD3 0x8012 (1588 register) bit 5 controls whether the WoL
> 	function is enabled or disabled. Defaults to enabled.
> 
> 	BMCR in copper/fiber can be used to save more power.
> 
> 	AR8035 details below also apply.
> 
> AR8035:
> 	No WOL_INT pin.
> 
> 	No MMD3 0x8012 register.
> 
> 	WoL interrupt enable in C22 register 0x12 bit 0
> 	WoL interrupt status in C22 register 0x13 bit 0
> 	WoL MAC address programmed in MMD3 registers 0x804a (bits 47:32)
> 	0x804b (bits 31:16) and 0x804c (bits 15:0)
> 
> So, what this means is that AR8035, the only possibility for WoL is via the INT
> pin and the C22 interrupt enable/status registers.
> 
> For AR8031 and AR8033, it depends how the hardware is wired.
> 
> If WOL_INT is used to wake the system, then MMD3 0x8012 has to be used
> to enable or disable that functionality. From my reading of the datasheets,
> WOL_INT is unaffected by the C22 interrupt enable register settings.
> 
> If INT is used to wake the system, then it behaves the same as AR8035.
> However, the datasheet doesn't make it clear whether MMD3 0x8012 bit 5
> also has an effect - although I would lean more towards it having an effect.
> 
> So, given that:
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c b/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c index
> > c1f307d90518..1d61f7190367 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c
> > @@ -459,21 +459,27 @@ static int at803x_set_wol(struct phy_device
> *phydev,
> >  			phy_write_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS,
> offsets[i],
> >  				      mac[(i * 2) + 1] | (mac[(i * 2)] << 8));
> >
> > -		/* Enable WOL function */
> > -		ret = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS,
> AT803X_PHY_MMD3_WOL_CTRL,
> > -				0, AT803X_WOL_EN);
> > -		if (ret)
> > -			return ret;
> > +		/* Enable WOL function for 1588 */
> > +		if (phydev->drv->phy_id == ATH8031_PHY_ID) {
> > +			ret = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS,
> > +					     AT803X_PHY_MMD3_WOL_CTRL,
> > +					     0, AT803X_WOL_EN);
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				return ret;
> > +		}
> >  		/* Enable WOL interrupt */
> >  		ret = phy_modify(phydev, AT803X_INTR_ENABLE, 0,
> AT803X_INTR_ENABLE_WOL);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			return ret;
> >  	} else {
> > -		/* Disable WoL function */
> > -		ret = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS,
> AT803X_PHY_MMD3_WOL_CTRL,
> > -				AT803X_WOL_EN, 0);
> > -		if (ret)
> > -			return ret;
> > +		/* Disable WoL function for 1588 */
> > +		if (phydev->drv->phy_id == ATH8031_PHY_ID) {
> > +			ret = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS,
> > +					     AT803X_PHY_MMD3_WOL_CTRL,
> > +					     AT803X_WOL_EN, 0);
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				return ret;
> > +		}
> >  		/* Disable WOL interrupt */
> >  		ret = phy_modify(phydev, AT803X_INTR_ENABLE,
> AT803X_INTR_ENABLE_WOL, 0);
> >  		if (ret)
> > @@ -508,11 +514,11 @@ static void at803x_get_wol(struct phy_device
> *phydev,
> >  	wol->supported = WAKE_MAGIC;
> >  	wol->wolopts = 0;
> >
> > -	value = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS,
> AT803X_PHY_MMD3_WOL_CTRL);
> > +	value = phy_read(phydev, AT803X_INTR_ENABLE);
> >  	if (value < 0)
> >  		return;
> >
> > -	if (value & AT803X_WOL_EN)
> > +	if (value & AT803X_INTR_ENABLE_WOL)
> >  		wol->wolopts |= WAKE_MAGIC;
> >  }
> >
> 
> The above all looks correct to me.
> 
> > @@ -858,9 +864,6 @@ static int at803x_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
> >  	if (phydev->drv->phy_id == ATH8031_PHY_ID) {
> >  		int ccr = phy_read(phydev, AT803X_REG_CHIP_CONFIG);
> >  		int mode_cfg;
> > -		struct ethtool_wolinfo wol = {
> > -			.wolopts = 0,
> > -		};
> >
> >  		if (ccr < 0)
> >  			return ccr;
> > @@ -876,13 +879,6 @@ static int at803x_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
> >  			priv->is_fiber = true;
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> > -
> > -		/* Disable WOL by default */
> > -		ret = at803x_set_wol(phydev, &wol);
> > -		if (ret < 0) {
> > -			phydev_err(phydev, "failed to disable WOL on
> probe: %d\n", ret);
> > -			return ret;
> > -		}
> >  	}
> >
> >  	return 0;
> 
> This doesn't look correct to me, because in the case of AR8031 or
> AR8033 using WOL_INT, because MMD3 0x8012 bit 5 defaults on reset to
> being set, if we don't want WoL enabled after the PHY has been probed, we
> need to clear it.

The intent was to remove the code added by d7cd5e06c9d ("net: phy: at803x: disable WOL at probe") which claims to be needed after 7beecaf7d507b ("net: phy: at803x: improve the WOL feature").  Since I have changed the behavior back to before 7beecaf7d507b, it is natural that this part of d7cd5e06c9d is no longer needed.

But if we want MMD3 0x8012 bit 5 to be aligned with the WOL_INT on probe, we probably just need to clear the bit for AR8031/8033 instead of calling the set_wol for all chips.

Regards,
Leo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ