netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] ip6mr: Fix skb_under_panic in ip6mr_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cbefa473-2d48-5df9-f773-8bb6bdcd6be1@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 21:18:47 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
 pabeni@...hat.com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, simon.horman@...igine.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ip6mr: Fix skb_under_panic in ip6mr_cache_report()

On 8/1/23 8:10 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:28:31 +0800 YueHaibing wrote:
>>> that pattern shows up a few times:  
>>
>> Ok, I will test and fix these if any.
> 
> Thanks, we may also want to add a 
>   DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(len > INT_MAX)
> in skb_push() but perhaps that's an overkill.
> Most of those cases are probably legit (skb_.*_offset()
> can well be negative if headers were already pulled).

Yea, a lot of those could be legit, so it would be best to have a test
case that shows it can be triggered and then any patch fixes it.