lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3148339d-cb12-368c-7d29-01ab39a9d879@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 17:01:48 -0700
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>, <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>,
	<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: gemini: Do not check for 0 return after
 calling platform_get_irq()

On 8/2/2023 1:52 AM, Ruan Jinjie wrote:
> It is not possible for platform_get_irq() to return 0. Use the
> return value from platform_get_irq().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>

These would likely have been better sent as a series (with the right
maintainers added to each patch) instead of 1 by 1 patches for all the
changes with platform_get_irq() code.

Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>






Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ