[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c90e655ed51d8a0e21e529573ebb46040de91663.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 12:04:32 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim
<jhs@...atatu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, Maxim Georgiev
<glipus@...il.com>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Peilin Ye
<yepeilin.cs@...il.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Zhengchao Shao
<shaozhengchao@...wei.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3 net-next 00/10] Improve the taprio
qdisc's relationship with its children
Hi,
On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 21:24 +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Changes in v3:
> Fix ptp_mock compilation as module, fix small mistakes in selftests.
>
> Changes in v2:
> It was requested to add test cases for the taprio software and offload modes.
> Those are patches 08 and 09.
>
> That implies adding taprio offload support to netdevsim, which is patch 07.
>
> In turn, that implies adding a PHC driver for netdevsim, which is patch 06.
>
> v1 at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230531173928.1942027-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/
>
> Original message:
>
> Prompted by Vinicius' request to consolidate some child Qdisc
> dereferences in taprio:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87edmxv7x2.fsf@intel.com/
>
> I remembered that I had left some unfinished work in this Qdisc, namely
> commit af7b29b1deaa ("Revert "net/sched: taprio: make qdisc_leaf() see
> the per-netdev-queue pfifo child qdiscs"").
>
> This patch set represents another stab at, essentially, what's in the
> title. Not only does taprio not properly detect when it's grafted as a
> non-root qdisc, but it also returns incorrect per-class stats.
> Eventually, Vinicius' request is addressed too, although in a different
> form than the one he requested (which was purely cosmetic).
>
> Review from people more experienced with Qdiscs than me would be
> appreciated. I tried my best to explain what I consider to be problems.
> I am deliberately targeting net-next because the changes are too
> invasive for net - they were reverted from stable once already.
The series LGTM, modulo the minor comments from Kurt on patch 6/10. I
agree they can be handled with follow-up patches.
Keeping it a little longer on PW: it would be great if someone from the
tc crew could have a look!
Thanks!
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists