netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/9] page_pool: don't use driver-set flags field directly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53c19bba-4513-0778-5e9a-2cffddad4465@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:42:12 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>, "David S. Miller"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
	Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>, Alexander Duyck
	<alexanderduyck@...com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, "Ilias
 Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, Simon Horman
	<simon.horman@...igine.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/9] page_pool: don't use driver-set flags field
 directly

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 09:40:43 -0700

> On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:07:23 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>>>> I would propose to include it in the series, but it has grown a bunch
>>>> already and it's better to do that later separately :s  
>>>
>>> Yeah.. I'd be trying to split your series up a little to make progress
>>> rather than add more things :( I was going to suggest that you post
>>> just the first 3 patches for instance. Should be an easy merge.  
>>
>> One minute before I was going to post v2 :>
>> Sounds good. AFACS only #4-6 are still under question (not for me tho
>> :D), let me move that piece out.
> 
> FWIW I'll apply my doc changes in the next 5min if nobody objects.
> Can you rebase on top of that?

Breh, sent already >_<

What do I do then? Rebase and send v3?

Thanks,
Olek