[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230803110424.5ca643c9@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 11:04:24 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
Cc: Xiang Yang <xiangyang3@...wei.com>, martineau@...nel.org,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mptcp: fix the incorrect judgment for
 msk->cb_flags
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 18:32:15 +0200 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> This Coccicheck report was useful, the optimisation in place was not
> working. But there was no impact apart from testing more conditions
> where there were no reasons to.
> 
> The fix is then good to me but it should land in -net, not in net-next.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
> 
> I don't know if it is needed to have a re-send just to change the subject.
Looks trivial enough to apply without a repost, but are you sure 
you don't want to take it into your tree? Run the selftests and all?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
