[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e0cb5bf2-2278-b83f-c45c-0556927787a6@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 15:47:48 +0200
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Alexander
Lobakin" <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/2] overflow: add DECLARE_FLEX() for on-stack
allocs
On 8/2/23 00:31, Kees Cook wrote:
[...]
> Initially I was struggling to make __counted_by work, but it seems we can
> use an initializer for that member, as long as we don't touch the flexible
> array member in the initializer. So we just need to add the counted-by
> member to the macro, and use a union to do the initialization. And if
> we take the address of the union (and not the struct within it), the
> compiler will see the correct object size with __builtin_object_size:
>
> #define DEFINE_FLEX(type, name, flex, counter, count) \
> union { \
> u8 bytes[struct_size_t(type, flex, count)]; \
> type obj; \
> } name##_u __aligned(_Alignof(type)) = { .obj.counter = count }; \
> /* take address of whole union to get the correct __builtin_object_size */ \
> type *name = (type *)&name##_u
>
> i.e. __builtin_object_size(name, 1) (as used by FORTIFY_SOURCE, etc)
> works correctly here, but breaks (sees a zero-sized flex array member)
> if this macro ends with:
>
> type *name = &name##_u.obj
__builtin_object_size(name, 0) works fine for both versions (with and
without .obj at the end)
however it does not work for builds without -O2 switch, so
struct_size_t() is rather a way to go :/
>
>
> -Kees
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/dd06e72e68bcb4070ef211be100d2896e236c8fb
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists