netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] team: remove unused input parameters in lb_htpm_select_tx_port and lb_hash_select_tx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b0bde83-5187-521d-e90b-1f36da541ce8@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 22:06:39 +0800
From: shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<weiyongjun1@...wei.com>, <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] team: remove unused input parameters in
 lb_htpm_select_tx_port and lb_hash_select_tx_port



On 2023/8/4 21:45, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 02:31:16PM CEST, shaozhengchao@...wei.com wrote:
>> The input parameters "lb_priv" and "skb" in lb_htpm_select_tx_port and
>> lb_hash_select_tx_port are unused, so remove them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/team/team_mode_loadbalance.c | 10 ++--------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/team/team_mode_loadbalance.c b/drivers/net/team/team_mode_loadbalance.c
>> index a6021ae51d0d..00f8989c29c0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/team/team_mode_loadbalance.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/team/team_mode_loadbalance.c
>> @@ -30,8 +30,6 @@ static rx_handler_result_t lb_receive(struct team *team, struct team_port *port,
>> struct lb_priv;
>>
>> typedef struct team_port *lb_select_tx_port_func_t(struct team *,
>> -						   struct lb_priv *,
>> -						   struct sk_buff *,
>> 						   unsigned char);
>>
>> #define LB_TX_HASHTABLE_SIZE 256 /* hash is a char */
>> @@ -118,8 +116,6 @@ static void lb_tx_hash_to_port_mapping_null_port(struct team *team,
>>
>> /* Basic tx selection based solely by hash */
>> static struct team_port *lb_hash_select_tx_port(struct team *team,
>> -						struct lb_priv *lb_priv,
>> -						struct sk_buff *skb,
>> 						unsigned char hash)
>> {
>> 	int port_index = team_num_to_port_index(team, hash);
>> @@ -129,8 +125,6 @@ static struct team_port *lb_hash_select_tx_port(struct team *team,
>>
>> /* Hash to port mapping select tx port */
>> static struct team_port *lb_htpm_select_tx_port(struct team *team,
>> -						struct lb_priv *lb__priv,
> 
> Squash the previous patch in this one to avoid this odd "__" thing.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
Hi Jiri:
	Thank you for your review. I will change it and send v2.

Zhengchao Shao
> 
>> -						struct sk_buff *skb,
>> 						unsigned char hash)
>> {
>> 	struct lb_priv *lb_priv = get_lb_priv(team);
>> @@ -140,7 +134,7 @@ static struct team_port *lb_htpm_select_tx_port(struct team *team,
>> 	if (likely(port))
>> 		return port;
>> 	/* If no valid port in the table, fall back to simple hash */
>> -	return lb_hash_select_tx_port(team, lb_priv, skb, hash);
>> +	return lb_hash_select_tx_port(team, hash);
>> }
>>
>> struct lb_select_tx_port {
>> @@ -230,7 +224,7 @@ static bool lb_transmit(struct team *team, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>
>> 	hash = lb_get_skb_hash(lb_priv, skb);
>> 	select_tx_port_func = rcu_dereference_bh(lb_priv->select_tx_port_func);
>> -	port = select_tx_port_func(team, lb_priv, skb, hash);
>> +	port = select_tx_port_func(team, hash);
>> 	if (unlikely(!port))
>> 		goto drop;
>> 	if (team_dev_queue_xmit(team, port, skb))
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
>