netdev - Re: [RFC Optimizing veth xsk performance 06/10] veth: add ndo_xsk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 23:01:24 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: "huangjie.albert" <huangjie.albert@...edance.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
	Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
	Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
	Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
	Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Richard Gobert <richardbgobert@...il.com>,
	Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
	"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:XDP (eXpress Data Path)" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC Optimizing veth xsk performance 06/10] veth: add
 ndo_xsk_wakeup callback for veth

On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 10:04:32PM +0800, huangjie.albert wrote:
> Signed-off-by: huangjie.albert <huangjie.albert@...edance.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/veth.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
> index 944761807ca4..600225e27e9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
> @@ -1840,6 +1840,45 @@ static void veth_set_rx_headroom(struct net_device *dev, int new_hr)
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  }
>  
> +static void veth_xsk_remote_trigger_napi(void *info)
> +{
> +	struct veth_sq *sq = info;
> +
> +	napi_schedule(&sq->xdp_napi);
> +}
> +
> +static int veth_xsk_wakeup(struct net_device *dev, u32 qid, u32 flag)
> +{
> +	struct veth_priv *priv;
> +	struct veth_sq *sq;
> +	u32 last_cpu, cur_cpu;
> +
> +	if (!netif_running(dev))
> +		return -ENETDOWN;
> +
> +	if (qid >= dev->real_num_rx_queues)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	sq = &priv->sq[qid];
> +
> +	if (napi_if_scheduled_mark_missed(&sq->xdp_napi))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	last_cpu = sq->xsk.last_cpu;
> +	cur_cpu = get_cpu();
> +
> +	/*  raise a napi */
> +	if (last_cpu == cur_cpu) {
> +		napi_schedule(&sq->xdp_napi);
> +	} else {
> +		smp_call_function_single(last_cpu, veth_xsk_remote_trigger_napi, sq, true);
> +	}

nit: no need for braces in the above.

	if (last_cpu == cur_cpu)
		napi_schedule(&sq->xdp_napi);
	else
		smp_call_function_single(last_cpu, veth_xsk_remote_trigger_napi, sq, true);

...