[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZM/Uuhl4GwOWjku9@vergenet.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 19:13:30 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Milena Olech <milena.olech@...el.com>,
Michal Michalik <michal.michalik@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, poros@...hat.com,
mschmidt@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] ptp_ocp: implement DPLL ops
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 08:04:53PM +0100, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> Implement basic DPLL operations in ptp_ocp driver as the
> simplest example of using new subsystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
> Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Hi Vadim,
...
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> index 32dff1b4f891..e4da62ac9a9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ config PTP_1588_CLOCK_OCP
> depends on COMMON_CLK
> select NET_DEVLINK
> select CRC16
> + select DPLL
> help
> This driver adds support for an OpenCompute time card.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
...
> +static int ptp_ocp_dpll_frequency_set(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
> + void *pin_priv,
> + const struct dpll_device *dpll,
> + void *dpll_priv, u64 frequency,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + struct ptp_ocp_sma_connector *sma = pin_priv;
> + struct ptp_ocp *bp = dpll_priv;
> + const struct ocp_selector *tbl;
> + int sma_nr = (sma - bp->sma);
> + int val, i;
> +
> + if (sma->fixed_fcn)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + tbl = bp->sma_op->tbl[sma->mode];
> + for (i = 0; tbl[i].name; i++)
> + if (tbl[i].frequency == frequency)
> + return ptp_ocp_sma_store_val(bp, val, sma->mode, sma_nr);
val appears to be used uninitialised here.
As flagged by clang-16 W=1, and Smatch.
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
...
> @@ -4233,8 +4437,40 @@ ptp_ocp_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>
> ptp_ocp_info(bp);
> devlink_register(devlink);
> - return 0;
>
> + clkid = pci_get_dsn(pdev);
> + bp->dpll = dpll_device_get(clkid, 0, THIS_MODULE);
> + if (IS_ERR(bp->dpll)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dpll_device_alloc failed\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + err = dpll_device_register(bp->dpll, DPLL_TYPE_PPS, &dpll_ops, bp);
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < OCP_SMA_NUM; i++) {
> + bp->sma[i].dpll_pin = dpll_pin_get(clkid, i, THIS_MODULE, &bp->sma[i].dpll_prop);
> + if (IS_ERR(bp->sma[i].dpll_pin))
The function will return err.
Should it be sett to an error value here?
As flagged by Smatch.
> + goto out_dpll;
> +
> + err = dpll_pin_register(bp->dpll, bp->sma[i].dpll_pin, &dpll_pins_ops,
> + &bp->sma[i]);
> + if (err) {
> + dpll_pin_put(bp->sma[i].dpll_pin);
> + goto out_dpll;
> + }
> + }
> + queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &bp->sync_work, HZ);
> +
> + return 0;
> +out_dpll:
> + while (i) {
> + --i;
> + dpll_pin_unregister(bp->dpll, bp->sma[i].dpll_pin, &dpll_pins_ops, &bp->sma[i]);
> + dpll_pin_put(bp->sma[i].dpll_pin);
> + }
> + dpll_device_put(bp->dpll);
> out:
> ptp_ocp_detach(bp);
> out_disable:
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists