netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: add Intel Agilex5 clock manager

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5b4bd1cd-ff2d-3aef-8e14-ec3b3c158864@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 12:53:38 -0500
From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>
To: "Rabara, Niravkumar L" <niravkumar.l.rabara@...el.com>,
 Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: "Ng, Adrian Ho Yin" <adrian.ho.yin.ng@...el.com>,
 "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>, "conor+dt@...nel.org"
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
 "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 "p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
 "richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
 "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 "sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
 "wen.ping.teh@...el.com" <wen.ping.teh@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: add Intel Agilex5 clock
 manager



On 8/2/23 02:14, Rabara, Niravkumar L wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, 2 August, 2023 3:02 PM
>> To: Rabara, Niravkumar L <niravkumar.l.rabara@...el.com>
>> Cc: Ng, Adrian Ho Yin <adrian.ho.yin.ng@...el.com>; andrew@...n.ch;
>> conor+dt@...nel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; dinguyen@...nel.org;
>> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org; linux-clk@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Turquette, Mike <mturquette@...libre.com>;
>> netdev@...r.kernel.org; p.zabel@...gutronix.de;
>> richardcochran@...il.com; robh+dt@...nel.org; sboyd@...nel.org;
>> wen.ping.teh@...el.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: add Intel Agilex5 clock
>> manager
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:58:42AM +0800, niravkumar.l.rabara@...el.com
>> wrote:
>>> From: Niravkumar L Rabara <niravkumar.l.rabara@...el.com>
>>>
>>> Add clock ID definitions for Intel Agilex5 SoCFPGA.
>>> The registers in Agilex5 handling the clock is named as clock manager.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Teh Wen Ping <wen.ping.teh@...el.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Niravkumar L Rabara <niravkumar.l.rabara@...el.com>
>>
>> Damn, I was too late - you already sent a v3 :/
>>
>> However, there only seems to be a v3 of this one patch and it was sent in
>> reply to the v2 series? The normal thing to do is resend the entire series, not
>> just one patch, as a new thread. Not using a new thread may make it harder
>> to apply & will also bury the email in people's mailboxes that use things like
>> mutt. A single patch as a reply is also confusing, as the rest of the v3 looks like
>> it is missing!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Conor.
> 
> Sorry I made a mistake.
> Should I send out entire series with PATCH v3 subject? Or should I wait for review comment on remaining patches and then send entire series with rework and  subject prefix PATCH v3?
> 

No need to send out a V3. I've applied patches 1-3 and 5. Will give a 
little more time for the clk patch.

Dinh