lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230807134547.2782227-4-imagedong@tencent.com>
Date: Mon,  7 Aug 2023 21:45:47 +0800
From: menglong8.dong@...il.com
To: edumazet@...gle.com,
	ncardwell@...gle.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	dsahern@...nel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: tcp: fix unexcepted socket die when snd_wnd is 0

From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>

In tcp_retransmit_timer(), a window shrunk connection will be regarded
as timeout if 'tcp_jiffies32 - tp->rcv_tstamp > TCP_RTO_MAX'. This is not
right all the time.

The retransmits will become zero-window probes in tcp_retransmit_timer()
if the 'snd_wnd==0'. Therefore, the icsk->icsk_rto will come up to
TCP_RTO_MAX sooner or later.

However, the timer is not precise enough, as it base on timer wheel.
Sorry that I am not good at timer, but I know the concept of time-wheel.
The longer of the timer, the rougher it will be. So the timeout is not
triggered after TCP_RTO_MAX, but 122877ms as I tested.

Therefore, 'tcp_jiffies32 - tp->rcv_tstamp > TCP_RTO_MAX' is always true
once the RTO come up to TCP_RTO_MAX, and the socket will die.

Fix this by replacing the 'tcp_jiffies32' with '(u32)icsk->icsk_timeout',
which is exact the timestamp of the timeout. Meanwhile, using
"max(tp->retrans_stamp, tp->rcv_tstamp)" as the last updated timestamp in
the receiving path, as "tp->rcv_tstamp" can restart from idle, then
tp->rcv_tstamp could already be a long time (minutes or hours) in the
past even on the first RTO.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CADxym3YyMiO+zMD4zj03YPM3FBi-1LHi6gSD2XT8pyAMM096pg@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>
---
v2:
- consider the case of the connection restart from idle, as Neal comment
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c
index d45c96c7f5a4..e4b2d8706cae 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c
@@ -454,6 +454,14 @@ static void tcp_fastopen_synack_timer(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req)
 			  req->timeout << req->num_timeout, TCP_RTO_MAX);
 }
 
+static bool tcp_rtx_probe0_timed_out(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
+	u32 last_ts;
+
+	last_ts = max(tp->retrans_stamp, tp->rcv_tstamp);
+	return inet_csk(sk)->icsk_timeout - last_ts > TCP_RTO_MAX;
+}
 
 /**
  *  tcp_retransmit_timer() - The TCP retransmit timeout handler
@@ -519,7 +527,7 @@ void tcp_retransmit_timer(struct sock *sk)
 					    tp->snd_una, tp->snd_nxt);
 		}
 #endif
-		if (tcp_jiffies32 - tp->rcv_tstamp > TCP_RTO_MAX) {
+		if (tcp_rtx_probe0_timed_out(sk)) {
 			tcp_write_err(sk);
 			goto out;
 		}
-- 
2.40.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ