lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20230807134547.2782227-4-imagedong@tencent.com> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 21:45:47 +0800 From: menglong8.dong@...il.com To: edumazet@...gle.com, ncardwell@...gle.com Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com> Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: tcp: fix unexcepted socket die when snd_wnd is 0 From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com> In tcp_retransmit_timer(), a window shrunk connection will be regarded as timeout if 'tcp_jiffies32 - tp->rcv_tstamp > TCP_RTO_MAX'. This is not right all the time. The retransmits will become zero-window probes in tcp_retransmit_timer() if the 'snd_wnd==0'. Therefore, the icsk->icsk_rto will come up to TCP_RTO_MAX sooner or later. However, the timer is not precise enough, as it base on timer wheel. Sorry that I am not good at timer, but I know the concept of time-wheel. The longer of the timer, the rougher it will be. So the timeout is not triggered after TCP_RTO_MAX, but 122877ms as I tested. Therefore, 'tcp_jiffies32 - tp->rcv_tstamp > TCP_RTO_MAX' is always true once the RTO come up to TCP_RTO_MAX, and the socket will die. Fix this by replacing the 'tcp_jiffies32' with '(u32)icsk->icsk_timeout', which is exact the timestamp of the timeout. Meanwhile, using "max(tp->retrans_stamp, tp->rcv_tstamp)" as the last updated timestamp in the receiving path, as "tp->rcv_tstamp" can restart from idle, then tp->rcv_tstamp could already be a long time (minutes or hours) in the past even on the first RTO. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CADxym3YyMiO+zMD4zj03YPM3FBi-1LHi6gSD2XT8pyAMM096pg@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com> --- v2: - consider the case of the connection restart from idle, as Neal comment --- net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c index d45c96c7f5a4..e4b2d8706cae 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c @@ -454,6 +454,14 @@ static void tcp_fastopen_synack_timer(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req) req->timeout << req->num_timeout, TCP_RTO_MAX); } +static bool tcp_rtx_probe0_timed_out(struct sock *sk) +{ + struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk); + u32 last_ts; + + last_ts = max(tp->retrans_stamp, tp->rcv_tstamp); + return inet_csk(sk)->icsk_timeout - last_ts > TCP_RTO_MAX; +} /** * tcp_retransmit_timer() - The TCP retransmit timeout handler @@ -519,7 +527,7 @@ void tcp_retransmit_timer(struct sock *sk) tp->snd_una, tp->snd_nxt); } #endif - if (tcp_jiffies32 - tp->rcv_tstamp > TCP_RTO_MAX) { + if (tcp_rtx_probe0_timed_out(sk)) { tcp_write_err(sk); goto out; } -- 2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists