netdev - Re: selftests: net/af_unix test_unix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230807204648.50070-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 13:46:47 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>
CC: <alexander@...alicyn.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<fw@...len.de>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: selftests: net/af_unix test_unix_oob [FAILED]

From: Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@....unizg.hr>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 21:44:41 +0200
> Hi all,
> 
> In the kernel 6.5-rc5 build on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (jammy jellyfish) on a Ryzen 7950 assembled box,
> vanilla torvalds tree kernel, the test test_unix_oob unexpectedly fails:
> 
> # selftests: net/af_unix: test_unix_oob
> # Test 2 failed, sigurg 23 len 63 OOB %
> 
> It is this code:
> 
>          /* Test 2:
>           * Verify that the first OOB is over written by
>           * the 2nd one and the first OOB is returned as
>           * part of the read, and sigurg is received.
>           */
>          wait_for_data(pfd, POLLIN | POLLPRI);
>          len = 0;
>          while (len < 70)
>                  len = recv(pfd, buf, 1024, MSG_PEEK);
>          len = read_data(pfd, buf, 1024);
>          read_oob(pfd, &oob);
>          if (!signal_recvd || len != 127 || oob != '#') {
>                  fprintf(stderr, "Test 2 failed, sigurg %d len %d OOB %c\n",
>                  signal_recvd, len, oob);
>                  die(1);
>          }
> 
> In 6.5-rc4, this test was OK, so it might mean we have a regression?

Thanks for reporting.

I confirmed the test doesn't fail on net-next at least, but it's based
on v6.5-rc4.

  ---8<---
  [root@...alhost ~]# ./test_unix_oob 
  [root@...alhost ~]# echo $?
  0
  [root@...alhost ~]# uname -r
  6.5.0-rc4-01192-g66244337512f
  ---8<---

I'll check 6.5-rc5 later.


> 
> marvin@...iant:~/linux/kernel/linux_torvalds$ grep test_unix_oob ../kselftest-6.5-rc4-1.log
> /net/af_unix/test_unix_oob
> # selftests: net/af_unix: test_unix_oob
> ok 2 selftests: net/af_unix: test_unix_oob
> marvin@...iant:~/linux/kernel/linux_torvalds$
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> NOTE: the kernel is vanilla torvalds tree, only "dirty" because the selftests were modified.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Mirsad Todorovac