lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZNCby8kzaZrxY+eJ@nanopsycho> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:22:51 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> To: Jinjian Song <songjinjian@...mail.com> Cc: chandrashekar.devegowda@...el.com, chiranjeevi.rapolu@...ux.intel.com, danielwinkler@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, haijun.liu@...iatek.com, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, jinjian.song@...ocom.com, johannes@...solutions.net, kuba@...nel.org, linuxwwan@...el.com, linuxwwan_5g@...el.com, loic.poulain@...aro.org, m.chetan.kumar@...ux.intel.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, ricardo.martinez@...ux.intel.com, ryazanov.s.a@...il.com, soumya.prakash.mishra@...el.com Subject: Re: [net-next 2/6] net: wwan: t7xx: Driver registers with Devlink framework Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 02:12:13PM CEST, songjinjian@...mail.com wrote: >Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 04:18:08AM CEST, songjinjian@...mail.com wrote: > >[...] > >>>+static const struct devlink_param t7xx_devlink_params[] = { >>>+ DEVLINK_PARAM_DRIVER(T7XX_DEVLINK_PARAM_ID_FASTBOOT, >>>+ "fastboot", DEVLINK_PARAM_TYPE_BOOL, >>>+ BIT(DEVLINK_PARAM_CMODE_DRIVERINIT), >>>+ NULL, NULL, NULL), >> >>driver init params is there so the user could configure driver instance >>and then hit devlink reload in order to reinitialize with the new param >>values. In your case, it is a device command. Does not make any sense to >>have it as param. >> >>NAK > >Thanks for your review, so drop this param and set this param insider driver when driver_reinit, >is that fine? I don't understand the question, sorry.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists