lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230807081225.816199-1-david@readahead.eu>
Date: Mon,  7 Aug 2023 10:12:25 +0200
From: David Rheinsberg <david@...dahead.eu>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander@...alicyn.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
	Luca Boccassi <bluca@...ian.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	David Rheinsberg <david@...dahead.eu>
Subject: [PATCH] net/unix: use consistent error code in SO_PEERPIDFD

Change the new (unreleased) SO_PEERPIDFD sockopt to return ENODATA
rather than ESRCH if a socket type does not support remote peer-PID
queries.

Currently, SO_PEERPIDFD returns ESRCH when the socket in question is
not an AF_UNIX socket. This is quite unexpected, given that one would
assume ESRCH means the peer process already exited and thus cannot be
found. However, in that case the sockopt actually returns EINVAL (via
pidfd_prepare()). This is rather inconsistent with other syscalls, which
usually return ESRCH if a given PID refers to a non-existant process.

This changes SO_PEERPIDFD to return ENODATA instead. This is also what
SO_PEERGROUPS returns, and thus keeps a consistent behavior across
sockopts.

Note that this code is returned in 2 cases: First, if the socket type is
not AF_UNIX, and secondly if the socket was not yet connected. In both
cases ENODATA seems suitable.

Signed-off-by: David Rheinsberg <david@...dahead.eu>
---
Hi!

The SO_PEERPIDFD sockopt has been queued for 6.5, so hopefully we can
get that in before the release?

Thanks
David

 net/core/sock.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 6d4f28efe29a..732fc37a4771 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ int sk_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 		spin_unlock(&sk->sk_peer_lock);
 
 		if (!peer_pid)
-			return -ESRCH;
+			return -ENODATA;
 
 		pidfd = pidfd_prepare(peer_pid, 0, &pidfd_file);
 		put_pid(peer_pid);
-- 
2.41.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ