[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZNNkQXLPc0yYwKjR@Laptop-X1>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 18:02:41 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Thomas Haller <thaller@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4/fib: send RTM_DELROUTE notify when flush
fib
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:06:07AM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> We can instead represent fib_nh_is_v6 and nh_updated using a single bit:
>
> diff --git a/include/net/ip_fib.h b/include/net/ip_fib.h
> index a378eff827c7..a91f8a28689a 100644
> --- a/include/net/ip_fib.h
> +++ b/include/net/ip_fib.h
> @@ -152,8 +152,8 @@ struct fib_info {
> #define fib_rtt fib_metrics->metrics[RTAX_RTT-1]
> #define fib_advmss fib_metrics->metrics[RTAX_ADVMSS-1]
> int fib_nhs;
> - bool fib_nh_is_v6;
> - bool nh_updated;
> + u8 fib_nh_is_v6:1,
> + nh_updated:1;
> struct nexthop *nh;
> struct rcu_head rcu;
> struct fib_nh fib_nh[];
>
> And then add another bit there to mark a FIB info that is deleted
> because of preferred source address deletion.
>
> I suggest testing with the FIB tests in tools/testing/selftests/net/.
Thanks for the suggestion. The discuss in this patch is getting too long.
Let me post the new patch and we can discuss there.
Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists