[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZNNyjNDht6v84hvS@orbyte.nwl.cc>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 13:03:40 +0200
From: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
To: "GONG, Ruiqi" <gongruiqi@...weicloud.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wang Weiyang <wangweiyang2@...wei.com>,
Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>, gongruiqi1@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ebtables: replace zero-length array members
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 03:51:36PM +0800, GONG, Ruiqi wrote:
> From: "GONG, Ruiqi" <gongruiqi1@...wei.com>
>
> As suggested by Kees[1], replace the old-style 0-element array members
> of multiple structs in ebtables.h with modern C99 flexible array.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/5E8E0F9C-EE3F-4B0D-B827-DC47397E2A4A@kernel.org/
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> Signed-off-by: GONG, Ruiqi <gongruiqi1@...wei.com>
I tried this once[1], but it was rejected pointing at a revert[2]. It
seems gcc was improved since then: The warning is gone and I don't find
-Wno-stringop-overflow flag in iptables sources.
Cheers, Phil
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200719100220.4666-1-phil@nwl.cc/
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=1e6e9d0f4859ec698d55381ea26f4136eff3afe1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists