lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1f162370-5878-80fc-25b9-0de22ba2efe1@linux.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 18:03:58 +0200 From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com> To: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, jaka@...ux.ibm.com, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com Cc: horms@...nel.org, alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com, guwen@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 3/6] net/smc: support smc v2.x features validate On 07.08.23 08:27, Guangguan Wang wrote: > Support smc v2.x features validate for smc v2.1. > a bit more description? > Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> > Reviewed-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com> > --- > net/smc/af_smc.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > net/smc/smc_clc.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > net/smc/smc_clc.h | 7 +++++++ > 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c > index 52279bdc100a..fd58e25beddf 100644 > --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c > +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c > @@ -1169,6 +1169,7 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma_v2_prepare(struct smc_sock *smc, > struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce = > (struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *) > (((u8 *)clc_v2) + sizeof(*clc_v2)); > + int rc; > > if (!ini->first_contact_peer || aclc->hdr.version == SMC_V1) > return 0; > @@ -1191,6 +1192,9 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma_v2_prepare(struct smc_sock *smc, > if (fce->release > SMC_RELEASE) > return SMC_CLC_DECL_VERSMISMAT; > ini->release_ver = fce->release; > + rc = smc_clc_cli_v2x_features_validate(fce, ini); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > > return 0; > } > @@ -1367,6 +1371,9 @@ static int smc_connect_ism(struct smc_sock *smc, > if (fce->release > SMC_RELEASE) > return SMC_CLC_DECL_VERSMISMAT; > ini->release_ver = fce->release; > + rc = smc_clc_cli_v2x_features_validate(fce, ini); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > } > > rc = smc_v2_determine_accepted_chid(aclc_v2, ini); > @@ -2417,6 +2424,10 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work) > if (rc) > goto out_decl; > > + rc = smc_clc_srv_v2x_features_validate(pclc, ini); > + if (rc) > + goto out_decl; > + > mutex_lock(&smc_server_lgr_pending); > smc_close_init(new_smc); > smc_rx_init(new_smc); > @@ -2449,6 +2460,13 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work) > goto out_decl; > } > > + rc = smc_clc_v2x_features_confirm_check(cclc, ini); > + if (rc) { > + if (!ini->is_smcd) > + goto out_unlock; > + goto out_decl; > + } > + > /* finish worker */ > if (!ini->is_smcd) { > rc = smc_listen_rdma_finish(new_smc, cclc, > diff --git a/net/smc/smc_clc.c b/net/smc/smc_clc.c > index ae80c191a834..4f6b69af2b80 100644 > --- a/net/smc/smc_clc.c > +++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.c > @@ -1158,6 +1158,52 @@ int smc_clc_send_accept(struct smc_sock *new_smc, bool srv_first_contact, > return len > 0 ? 0 : len; > } > > +int smc_clc_srv_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *pclc, > + struct smc_init_info *ini) > +{ > + struct smc_clc_v2_extension *pclc_v2_ext; > + > + if ((!(ini->smcd_version & SMC_V2) && !(ini->smcr_version & SMC_V2)) || > + ini->release_ver < SMC_RELEASE_1) > + return 0; > + > + pclc_v2_ext = smc_get_clc_v2_ext(pclc); > + if (!pclc_v2_ext) > + return SMC_CLC_DECL_NOV2EXT; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +int smc_clc_cli_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce, > + struct smc_init_info *ini) > +{ > + if (ini->release_ver < SMC_RELEASE_1) > + return 0; > + > + return 0; > +} Why need the function? Since it returns 0 anyway. > + > +int smc_clc_v2x_features_confirm_check(struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm *cclc, > + struct smc_init_info *ini) > +{ > + struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm_v2 *clc_v2 = > + (struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm_v2 *)cclc; > + struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce = > + smc_get_clc_first_contact_ext(clc_v2, ini->is_smcd); > + > + if (cclc->hdr.version == SMC_V1 || > + !(cclc->hdr.typev2 & SMC_FIRST_CONTACT_MASK)) > + return 0; > + > + if (ini->release_ver != fce->release) > + return SMC_CLC_DECL_RELEASEERR; > + > + if (fce->release < SMC_RELEASE_1) > + return 0; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > void smc_clc_get_hostname(u8 **host) > { > *host = &smc_hostname[0]; > diff --git a/net/smc/smc_clc.h b/net/smc/smc_clc.h > index 6133276a8839..66932bfdc6d0 100644 > --- a/net/smc/smc_clc.h > +++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.h > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ > #define SMC_CLC_DECL_NOSEID 0x03030006 /* peer sent no SEID */ > #define SMC_CLC_DECL_NOSMCD2DEV 0x03030007 /* no SMC-Dv2 device found */ > #define SMC_CLC_DECL_NOUEID 0x03030008 /* peer sent no UEID */ > +#define SMC_CLC_DECL_RELEASEERR 0x03030009 /* release version negotiate failed */ > #define SMC_CLC_DECL_MODEUNSUPP 0x03040000 /* smc modes do not match (R or D)*/ > #define SMC_CLC_DECL_RMBE_EC 0x03050000 /* peer has eyecatcher in RMBE */ > #define SMC_CLC_DECL_OPTUNSUPP 0x03060000 /* fastopen sockopt not supported */ > @@ -415,6 +416,12 @@ int smc_clc_send_confirm(struct smc_sock *smc, bool clnt_first_contact, > u8 version, u8 *eid, struct smc_init_info *ini); > int smc_clc_send_accept(struct smc_sock *smc, bool srv_first_contact, > u8 version, u8 *negotiated_eid, struct smc_init_info *ini); > +int smc_clc_srv_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *pclc, > + struct smc_init_info *ini); > +int smc_clc_cli_v2x_features_validate(struct smc_clc_first_contact_ext *fce, > + struct smc_init_info *ini); > +int smc_clc_v2x_features_confirm_check(struct smc_clc_msg_accept_confirm *cclc, > + struct smc_init_info *ini); > void smc_clc_init(void) __init; > void smc_clc_exit(void); > void smc_clc_get_hostname(u8 **host);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists