netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] net: Fix slab-out-of-bounds in inet[6]_steal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 17:55:02 +0100
From: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...valent.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net, 
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	martin.lau@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, memxor@...il.com, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] net: Fix slab-out-of-bounds in inet[6]_steal_sock

On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 4:56 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> wrote:
>
> > Things we could do if necessary:
> > 1. Reset the flag in inet_csk_clone_lock like we do for SOCK_RCU_FREE
>
> I think we can't do this as sk_reuseport is inherited to twsk and used
> in inet_bind_conflict().

Ok, so what kind of state does reuseport carry in the various states then?

TCP_LISTEN: sk_reuseport && sk_reuseport_cb
TCP_ESTABLISHED: sk_reuseport && !sk_reuseport_cb
TCP_TIME_WAIT: sk_reuseport && !sk_reuseport_cb

Where is sk_reuseport_cb cleared? On clone? Or not at all?

> > 2. Duplicate the cb check into inet[6]_steal_sock
>
> or 3. Add sk_fullsock() test ?

I guess this would be in addition to the convoluted series of checks
I've removed in this patch?