Message-ID: <87il9nfbid.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:16:26 +0200
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John
 Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Björn Töpel
 <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Alexei Starovoitov
 <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Song
 Liu <song@...nel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Yonghong Song
 <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, KP
 Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa
 <jolsa@...nel.org>, houtao1@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf, cpumap: Use queue_rcu_work() to
 remove unnecessary rcu_barrier()

Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com> writes:

> From: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
>
> As for now __cpu_map_entry_replace() uses call_rcu() to wait for the
> inflight xdp program and NAPI poll to exit the RCU read critical
> section, and then launch kworker cpu_map_kthread_stop() to call
> kthread_stop() to handle all pending xdp frames or skbs.
>
> But it is unnecessary to use rcu_barrier() in cpu_map_kthread_stop() to
> wait for the completion of __cpu_map_entry_free(), because rcu_barrier()
> will wait for all pending RCU callbacks and cpu_map_kthread_stop() only
> needs to wait for the completion of a specific __cpu_map_entry_free().
>
> So use queue_rcu_work() to replace call_rcu(), schedule_work() and
> rcu_barrier(). queue_rcu_work() will queue a __cpu_map_entry_free()
> kworker after a RCU grace period. Because __cpu_map_entry_free() is
> running in a kworker context, so it is OK to do all of these freeing
> procedures include kthread_stop() in it.
>
> After the update, there is no need to do reference-counting for
> bpf_cpu_map_entry, because bpf_cpu_map_entry is freed directly in
> __cpu_map_entry_free(), so just remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>

I think your analysis is correct, and this is a nice cleanup of what is
really a bit of an over-complicated cleanup flow - well done!

I have a few nits below, but with those feel free to resend as non-RFC
and add my:

Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>

> ---
>  kernel/bpf/cpumap.c | 93 +++++++++++----------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
> index 0a16e30b16ef..24f39c37526f 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
> @@ -67,10 +67,7 @@ struct bpf_cpu_map_entry {
>  	struct bpf_cpumap_val value;
>  	struct bpf_prog *prog;
>  
> -	atomic_t refcnt; /* Control when this struct can be free'ed */
> -	struct rcu_head rcu;
> -
> -	struct work_struct kthread_stop_wq;
> +	struct rcu_work free_work;
>  };
>  
>  struct bpf_cpu_map {
> @@ -115,11 +112,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *cpu_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
>  	return &cmap->map;
>  }
>  
> -static void get_cpu_map_entry(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu)
> -{
> -	atomic_inc(&rcpu->refcnt);
> -}
> -
>  static void __cpu_map_ring_cleanup(struct ptr_ring *ring)
>  {
>  	/* The tear-down procedure should have made sure that queue is
> @@ -134,43 +126,6 @@ static void __cpu_map_ring_cleanup(struct ptr_ring *ring)
>  			xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
>  }
>  
> -static void put_cpu_map_entry(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu)
> -{
> -	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcpu->refcnt)) {
> -		if (rcpu->prog)
> -			bpf_prog_put(rcpu->prog);
> -		/* The queue should be empty at this point */
> -		__cpu_map_ring_cleanup(rcpu->queue);
> -		ptr_ring_cleanup(rcpu->queue, NULL);
> -		kfree(rcpu->queue);
> -		kfree(rcpu);
> -	}
> -}
> -
> -/* called from workqueue, to workaround syscall using preempt_disable */
> -static void cpu_map_kthread_stop(struct work_struct *work)
> -{
> -	struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu;
> -	int err;
> -
> -	rcpu = container_of(work, struct bpf_cpu_map_entry, kthread_stop_wq);
> -
> -	/* Wait for flush in __cpu_map_entry_free(), via full RCU barrier,
> -	 * as it waits until all in-flight call_rcu() callbacks complete.
> -	 */
> -	rcu_barrier();
> -
> -	/* kthread_stop will wake_up_process and wait for it to complete */
> -	err = kthread_stop(rcpu->kthread);
> -	if (err) {
> -		/* kthread_stop may be called before cpu_map_kthread_run
> -		 * is executed, so we need to release the memory related
> -		 * to rcpu.
> -		 */
> -		put_cpu_map_entry(rcpu);
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static void cpu_map_bpf_prog_run_skb(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu,
>  				     struct list_head *listp,
>  				     struct xdp_cpumap_stats *stats)
> @@ -395,7 +350,6 @@ static int cpu_map_kthread_run(void *data)
>  	}
>  	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>  
> -	put_cpu_map_entry(rcpu);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -471,9 +425,6 @@ __cpu_map_entry_alloc(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_cpumap_val *value,
>  	if (IS_ERR(rcpu->kthread))
>  		goto free_prog;
>  
> -	get_cpu_map_entry(rcpu); /* 1-refcnt for being in cmap->cpu_map[] */
> -	get_cpu_map_entry(rcpu); /* 1-refcnt for kthread */
> -
>  	/* Make sure kthread runs on a single CPU */
>  	kthread_bind(rcpu->kthread, cpu);
>  	wake_up_process(rcpu->kthread);
> @@ -494,7 +445,7 @@ __cpu_map_entry_alloc(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_cpumap_val *value,
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static void __cpu_map_entry_free(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> +static void __cpu_map_entry_free(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu;
>  
> @@ -503,30 +454,33 @@ static void __cpu_map_entry_free(struct rcu_head *rcu)
>  	 * new packets and cannot change/set flush_needed that can
>  	 * find this entry.
>  	 */
> -	rcpu = container_of(rcu, struct bpf_cpu_map_entry, rcu);
> +	rcpu = container_of(to_rcu_work(work), struct bpf_cpu_map_entry, free_work);
>  
>  	free_percpu(rcpu->bulkq);

Let's move this free down to the end along with the others.

> -	/* Cannot kthread_stop() here, last put free rcpu resources */
> -	put_cpu_map_entry(rcpu);
> +
> +	/* kthread_stop will wake_up_process and wait for it to complete */

Suggest adding to this comment: "cpu_map_kthread_run() makes sure the
pointer ring is empty before exiting."

> +	kthread_stop(rcpu->kthread);
> +
> +	if (rcpu->prog)
> +		bpf_prog_put(rcpu->prog);
> +	/* The queue should be empty at this point */
> +	__cpu_map_ring_cleanup(rcpu->queue);
> +	ptr_ring_cleanup(rcpu->queue, NULL);
> +	kfree(rcpu->queue);
> +	kfree(rcpu);
>  }
>  
>  /* After xchg pointer to bpf_cpu_map_entry, use the call_rcu() to
> - * ensure any driver rcu critical sections have completed, but this
> - * does not guarantee a flush has happened yet. Because driver side
> - * rcu_read_lock/unlock only protects the running XDP program.  The
> - * atomic xchg and NULL-ptr check in __cpu_map_flush() makes sure a
> - * pending flush op doesn't fail.
> + * ensure both any driver rcu critical sections and xdp_do_flush()
> + * have completed.
>   *
>   * The bpf_cpu_map_entry is still used by the kthread, and there can
> - * still be pending packets (in queue and percpu bulkq).  A refcnt
> - * makes sure to last user (kthread_stop vs. call_rcu) free memory
> - * resources.
> + * still be pending packets (in queue and percpu bulkq).
>   *
> - * The rcu callback __cpu_map_entry_free flush remaining packets in
> - * percpu bulkq to queue.  Due to caller map_delete_elem() disable
> - * preemption, cannot call kthread_stop() to make sure queue is empty.
> - * Instead a work_queue is started for stopping kthread,
> - * cpu_map_kthread_stop, which waits for an RCU grace period before
> + * Due to caller map_delete_elem() is in RCU read critical section,
> + * cannot call kthread_stop() to make sure queue is empty. Instead
> + * a work_struct is started for stopping kthread,
> + * __cpu_map_entry_free, which waits for a RCU grace period before
>   * stopping kthread, emptying the queue.
>   */

I think the above comment is a bit too convoluted, still. I'd suggest
just replacing the whole thing with this:

/* After the xchg of the bpf_cpu_map_entry pointer, we need to make sure the old
 * entry is no longer in use before freeing. We use queue_rcu_work() to call
 * __cpu_map_entry_free() in a separate workqueue after waiting for an RCU grace
 * period. This means that (a) all pending enqueue and flush operations have
 * completed (because or the RCU callback), and (b) we are in a workqueue
 * context where we can stop the kthread and wait for it to exit before freeing
 * everything.
 */

>  static void __cpu_map_entry_replace(struct bpf_cpu_map *cmap,
> @@ -536,9 +490,8 @@ static void __cpu_map_entry_replace(struct bpf_cpu_map *cmap,
>  
>  	old_rcpu = unrcu_pointer(xchg(&cmap->cpu_map[key_cpu], RCU_INITIALIZER(rcpu)));
>  	if (old_rcpu) {
> -		call_rcu(&old_rcpu->rcu, __cpu_map_entry_free);
> -		INIT_WORK(&old_rcpu->kthread_stop_wq, cpu_map_kthread_stop);
> -		schedule_work(&old_rcpu->kthread_stop_wq);
> +		INIT_RCU_WORK(&old_rcpu->free_work, __cpu_map_entry_free);
> +		queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &old_rcpu->free_work);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.29.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists