netdev - Re: [PATCH V8 1/9] drivers core: Add support for Wifi band RF mitigations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <efb2d30c-3945-a63d-9a3f-7cf39124f76a@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 08:41:07 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Evan Quan <evan.quan@....com>, rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
 Alexander.Deucher@....com, Christian.Koenig@....com, Xinhui.Pan@....com,
 airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, johannes@...solutions.net,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, Mario.Limonciello@....com, mdaenzer@...hat.com,
 maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, tzimmermann@...e.de, hdegoede@...hat.com,
 jingyuwang_vip@....com, Lijo.Lazar@....com, jim.cromie@...il.com,
 bellosilicio@...il.com, andrealmeid@...lia.com, trix@...hat.com,
 jsg@....id.au, arnd@...db.de, andrew@...n.ch
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
 amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/9] drivers core: Add support for Wifi band RF
 mitigations



On 8/10/23 00:37, Evan Quan wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index a1457995fd41..21f73a0bbd0b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -7152,3 +7152,12 @@
>  				xmon commands.
>  			off	xmon is disabled.
>  
> +	wbrf=		[KNL]
> +			Format: { on | auto | off }
> +			Controls if WBRF features should be enabled or disabled
> +			forcely. Default is auto.

"forcely" is not a word. "forcedly" is a word, but it's not used very much
AFAIK.
I would probably write "Controls if WBRF features should be forced on or off."

> +			on	Force enable the WBRF features.
> +			auto	Up to the system to do proper checks to
> +				determine the WBRF features should be enabled
> +				or not.
> +			off	Force disable the WBRF features.

-- 
~Randy