[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230810115444.21364456.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:54:44 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Brett Creeley <bcreeley@....com>, Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@....com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "yishaih@...dia.com" <yishaih@...dia.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, "horms@...nel.org"
<horms@...nel.org>, "shannon.nelson@....com" <shannon.nelson@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 vfio 6/8] vfio/pds: Add support for dirty page
tracking
On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:43:04 -0300
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:40:08AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> > PCI Express® Base Specification Revision 6.0.1, pg 1461:
> >
> > 9.3.3.11 VF Device ID (Offset 1Ah)
> >
> > This field contains the Device ID that should be presented for every VF to the SI.
> >
> > VF Device ID may be different from the PF Device ID...
> >
> > That? Thanks,
>
> NVMe matches using the class code, IIRC there is language requiring
> the class code to be the same.
Ok, yes:
7.5.1.1.6 Class Code Register (Offset 09h)
...
The field in a PF and its associated VFs must return the same value
when read.
Seems limiting, but it's indeed there. We've got a lot of cleanup to
do if we're going to start rejecting drivers for devices with PCI
spec violations though ;) Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists