[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230810183118.3z77lrnun5pukgfa@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 21:31:18 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Sergei Antonov <saproj@...il.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: mv88e6060: add phylink_get_caps
implementation
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:17:33PM +0300, Sergei Antonov wrote:
> I am planning to submit a platform using "marvell,mv88e6060". For the
> next release cycle hopefully.
> Our should I rather try to move MV88E6060 support to /mv88e6xxx?
Device tree bindings and the driver implementation should be seen as
separate things. You can submit a platform for mv88e6060 regardless of
what driver it's using, and if the driver is merged into mv88e6xxx, that
needs to support the existing platforms as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists