netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/6] imx6q related DT binding fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230810-endearing-regime-55ef11e2eb10@spud>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:16:38 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] imx6q related DT binding fixes

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 04:44:45PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> while working on i.MX6Q based board (arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6q-mba6a.dts)
> I noticed several warnings on dtbs_check. The first 5 patches should be pretty
> much straight forward.
> I'm not 100% sure on the sixth patch, as it might be affected by incorrect
> compatible lists. Please refer to the note in that patch.
> I'm also no sure whether thse patches warrent a Fixes tag, so I only added that
> for patch 3. All of these patches are independent and can be picked up
> individually.

These all seem fine to me, with the last one being really a question for
those with knowledge of the hardware.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)