lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4caa3f6-66d2-db44-0e21-900fe663da48@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:51:30 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
 "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
 Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/4][next] i40e: Replace one-element
 array with flex-array member in struct i40e_profile_segment



On 8/10/23 14:49, Justin Stitt wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 05:34:04PM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 11:05:59PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>> One-element and zero-length arrays are deprecated. So, replace
>>> one-element array in struct i40e_profile_segment with flexible-array
>>> member.
>>>
>>> This results in no differences in binary output.
>>>
>>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/335
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_type.h | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> Tested-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
> Whoops, this should be:
> Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
> 
> I did not test, I just verified there are no binary differences produced
> by this patch.

In that case, `Build-tested-by` seems more appropriate.

Anyways, the series has been applied already.

--
Gustavo


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ