[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB527634BA82AD978D4053F0E08C13A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 03:46:22 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Brett Creeley <bcreeley@....com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@....com>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org"
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"yishaih@...dia.com" <yishaih@...dia.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, "simon.horman@...igine.com"
<simon.horman@...igine.com>, "shannon.nelson@....com"
<shannon.nelson@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v13 vfio 6/7] vfio/pds: Add support for firmware recovery
> From: Brett Creeley <bcreeley@....com>
> Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2023 2:51 AM
>
> On 8/4/2023 11:03 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper
> caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 10:34:18AM -0700, Brett Creeley wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/4/2023 10:18 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper
> caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:40:24PM -0700, Brett Creeley wrote:
> >>>> It's possible that the device firmware crashes and is able to recover
> >>>> due to some configuration and/or other issue. If a live migration
> >>>> is in progress while the firmware crashes, the live migration will
> >>>> fail. However, the VF PCI device should still be functional post
> >>>> crash recovery and subsequent migrations should go through as
> >>>> expected.
> >>>>
> >>>> When the pds_core device notices that firmware crashes it sends an
> >>>> event to all its client drivers. When the pds_vfio driver receives
> >>>> this event while migration is in progress it will request a deferred
> >>>> reset on the next migration state transition. This state transition
> >>>> will report failure as well as any subsequent state transition
> >>>> requests from the VMM/VFIO. Based on uapi/vfio.h the only way out of
> >>>> VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_ERROR is by issuing VFIO_DEVICE_RESET. Once
> this
> >>>> reset is done, the migration state will be reset to
> >>>> VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING and migration can be performed.
> >>>
> >>> Have you actually tested this? Does the qemu side respond properly if
> >>> this happens during a migration?
> >>>
> >>> Jason
> >>
> >> Yes, this has actually been tested. It's not necessary clean as far as the
> >> log messages go because the driver may still be getting requests (i.e. dirty
> >> log requests), but the noise should be okay because this is a very rare
> >> event.
> >>
> >> QEMU does respond properly and in the manner I mentioned above.
> >
> > But what actually happens?
> >
> > QEMU aborts the migration and FLRs the device and then the VM has a
> > totally trashed PCI function?
> >
> > Can the VM recover from this?
> >
> > Jason
>
> As it mentions above, the VM and PCI function do recover from this and
> the subsequent migration works as expected.
>
If reset is requested by the host how is the VM notified to handle this
undesired situation? Would it lead to observable application failures
inside the guest after the recovery?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists