lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230811161509.19722-19-larysa.zaremba@intel.com> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:15:06 +0200 From: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com> To: bpf@...r.kernel.org Cc: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>, Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@...el.com>, Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>, Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>, Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@...hat.com>, xdp-hints@...-project.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>, Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com> Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 18/21] net: make vlan_get_tag() return -ENODATA instead of -EINVAL __vlan_hwaccel_get_tag() is used in veth XDP hints implementation, its return value (-EINVAL if skb is not VLAN tagged) is passed to bpf code, but XDP hints specification requires drivers to return -ENODATA, if a hint cannot be provided for a particular packet. Solve this inconsistency by changing error return value of __vlan_hwaccel_get_tag() from -EINVAL to -ENODATA, do the same thing to __vlan_get_tag(), because this function is supposed to follow the same convention. This, in turn, makes -ENODATA the only non-zero value vlan_get_tag() can return. We can do this with no side effects, because none of the users of the 3 above-mentioned functions rely on the exact value. Suggested-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com> Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com> --- include/linux/if_vlan.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/if_vlan.h b/include/linux/if_vlan.h index 3028af87716e..c1645c86eed9 100644 --- a/include/linux/if_vlan.h +++ b/include/linux/if_vlan.h @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static inline int __vlan_get_tag(const struct sk_buff *skb, u16 *vlan_tci) struct vlan_ethhdr *veth = skb_vlan_eth_hdr(skb); if (!eth_type_vlan(veth->h_vlan_proto)) - return -EINVAL; + return -ENODATA; *vlan_tci = ntohs(veth->h_vlan_TCI); return 0; @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static inline int __vlan_hwaccel_get_tag(const struct sk_buff *skb, return 0; } else { *vlan_tci = 0; - return -EINVAL; + return -ENODATA; } } -- 2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists