[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ea7796f-9d31-49a5-849e-3a52d35e26ea@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 19:11:33 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Chris Lew <quic_clew@...cinc.com>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] soc: qcom: aoss: Add debugfs interface for
sending messages
> As mentioned in the cover letter, I do recognize your concern here. I
> don't see it as a realistic way to work around the kernel for reasons of
> being proprietary - given that we don't have debugfs mounted in the vast
> majority of product.
Look around. How many drivers do you see which allow passing binary
blobs to firmware?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists